William Wu (theopera) — National Master
William Wu, known online as theopera, is a National Master whose name pops up in blitz lobbies like a plot twist in a mystery novel. Starting from humble online skirmishes in 2020, William exploded onto the scene and became a true blitz specialist — mixing tactical fireworks with surprisingly patient endgame play. Preferred time control: Blitz. Keywords for search engines: William Wu, theopera, National Master, blitz specialist, Amar Gambit, Barnes Defense.
Playing Style & Signature Openings
William is equal parts trapsetter and marathon finisher. His games show:
- Blitz-first mindset: quick intuition, aggressive piece play, and a knack for chaotic positions.
- Endgame stamina: longer decisive games are common — William averages roughly 62 moves per win, which suggests he doesn’t always cash in early and will grind in technical positions.
- Psychology: a healthy comeback rate and a tilt factor that keeps opponents guessing.
Favorite and high-usage openings (with plenty of wins) include the Amar Gambit (a personal favorite), the Barnes Defense and cheeky trap lines like the Blackburne Shilling Gambit. Whether launching the Amar Gambit or springing a Barnes surprise, William thrives where complications reign.
Career Highlights & Notes
Highlights worth mentioning in a single breath (and a few laughs):
- Earned the title National Master — the official nod that you know what you’re doing when the clocks tick down.
- Steady climb from online beginner months in 2020 to sustained elite blitz performance by 2024–2026.
- Remarkable streaks: a longest winning streak of 40 games and a longest losing streak of 49 — proof that chess is a rollercoaster and William buys the season ticket.
- Preferred time control officially recorded as Blitz — he’s happiest when the seconds melt away and tactics spring like mousetraps.
For readers who love numbers, here’s a compact visual placeholder that summarizes the blitz journey:
and a quick stat: 2830 (2026-01-09).Memorable Traits & Trends
- Endgame frequency is high — William finishes complex middlegames rather than banking on early tactical finishes.
- Strong comeback ability (high ComebackRate) and respectable win rates after material losses — an opponent can’t sleep on him even when a piece is gone.
- Time-of-day quirks: some hours show spectacular win rates (for example small-sample peaks at 09:00 and hour '9' reports) — anecdotal proof that chess and circadian rhythm are best friends.
- Openings with exceptional day-to-day performance appear across Blitz, Bullet and Rapid: the Amar Gambit does especially well in bullet/blitz, while the Barnes Defense shows up with surprising success in daily games.
Fun Facts & Placeholders
A few entertaining morsels for fans and profiles:
- Nickname: theopera — likely because his games contain dramatic arias and surprise finales.
- Streak theater: longest win run = 40 games; longest losing run = 49 games. A true drama buff.
- Sample game viewer (playback placeholder):
- Opponent spotlight: most-played rival listed in records — tobyrobert.
Why Follow William Wu?
If you like tactical puzzles, surprise openings, and players who will outlast you in a long endgame, William (theopera) should be on your watchlist. He combines the thrill of gambit play with the discipline of endgame technique — plus a sense of humor (and the occasional Barnes Defense) that keeps spectators smiling.
Placeholders to enrich this profile:
- 2830 (2026-01-09)
- Amar Gambit, Barnes Defense, Blackburne Shilling Gambit
Quick summary
William — nice work in your recent blitz stretch. You showed good practical instincts: creating space on the flank, activating heavy pieces, and finding tactical shots when opponents left loose pieces. You also had a few slips against stronger opposition (Hikaru) where simplifications and piece exchanges reduced your counterplay. Below are concrete points to keep doing and things to fix.
Games to review (quick links)
- Win vs Sully McConnell — good tactical conversion (view game):
- Loss vs Hikaru Nakamura — instructive simplification and activity issues:
What you're doing well
- Creating space and targets — your queenside pawn pushes (b4–b5) in the win forced the opponent to create weaknesses and gave you clear targets to attack.
- Active heavy pieces — you used rooks and the queen to invade open files and ranks (the winning sequence with the rook on the fourth rank was decisive).
- Tactical awareness — you spotted and executed combinations once an opponent left material or squares undefended (you converted when the tactic presented itself).
- Practical speed — in blitz you kept the pace and avoided long, needless thinking early in the game, which is good for time management in this control.
Key areas to improve
- Choice of simplifications: Against stronger, active opponents you simplified into positions where they retain more active pieces. Before trading pieces, ask: "Who benefits from fewer pieces?" If your opponent has the more active pieces, keep tension and look for counterplay instead of simplifying immediately.
- Watch exchanges that release pressure — the exchange on c5 in the Hikaru game (you allowed Rxc5 then traded knights) reduced your ability to contest open files. Try to maintain pieces that contest opponent activity.
- Opening clarity: you often reach middlegames from lines like the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and some Modern/King's Indian type setups. Refresh typical plans and pawn breaks for those lines so you can spend less time deciding on plans in blitz and avoid early inaccuracies.
- Tactical follow-through: you found good tactics when opponents erred, but double-check for back-rank or infiltration threats before launching major pawn pushes — many blitz losses come from one-move tactical oversights.
Concrete training plan (next 2–4 weeks)
- Daily 10–15 minute tactic session (focus: pins, forks, discovered attacks, back-rank mates). Use mixed difficulty but emphasize speed and pattern recognition.
- Two opening refreshes per week: pick your most-played opening (I suggest reviewing the main ideas and 3 typical middlegame plans for Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and your favorite Black replies). Learn one model game and one trap to avoid.
- One annotated blitz review per evening: pick a recent loss and write 3 things you missed and 3 alternative moves — keep it short and actionable.
- One slow training game per week (10+5 or 15|10): force deeper calculation, especially at moments you normally simplify. Practise resisting simplification when opponent is more active.
- Endgame micro-practice: spend 5–10 minutes twice a week on rook endgames and basic pawn endings — small advantages win more in blitz if you know the technique.
Tactical checklist to use during blitz
- Before trading: who gets the open file / outpost? If the opponent does, avoid the trade.
- Before pushing a flank pawn (a/b or g/h/file): check for opponent infiltration squares and back-rank weaknesses.
- Always scan for opponent tactics before making a "quiet" move — many blunders happen after an unexpected in-between move by the opponent.
- If you have less time, simplify only when you are sure the resulting position is equal or better in activity.
Next steps (quick wins)
- Run a 10–15 minute tactic session right after this — focus specifically on rook/queen battery and back-rank mates.
- Re-open the Hikaru loss and ask: what single exchange removed my counterplay? Write down the alternative and play it through slowly once.
- Before your next blitz session, review one model game in the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation so the first 10 moves feel automatic.
Motivation & wrap-up
Your results show strong practical ability — keep sharpening pattern recognition and be more selective about exchanges. Small changes (one better exchange decision per game) will raise your conversion rate in blitz quickly. If you want, I can prepare a short annotated version of one of the two games above with 3 concrete improvements — tell me which game you want reviewed first.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aryan Achuthan | 11W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Humberto L. Blanco Ronquillo | 1W / 4L / 0D | View |
| Yasser Hadj Khoulti | 3W / 1L / 1D | View |
| iiu | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| smallbaba | 6W / 2L / 0D | View |
| drabmajor2011 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Hikaru Nakamura | 0W / 4L / 0D | View |
| p_k_a | 4W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Vladyslav Sydoryka | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Bu11et_Pr00f | 4W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| tobyrobert | 38W / 213L / 6D | View Games |
| malachi1971 | 2W / 103L / 3D | View Games |
| dlevine32180 | 0W / 57L / 1D | View Games |
| realslimshadyx | 8W / 32L / 5D | View Games |
| Will Moorhouse | 17W / 14L / 7D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2843 | 2812 | 2503 | |
| 2025 | 2750 | 2801 | 2502 | 1600 |
| 2024 | 2651 | 2532 | 2344 | 1681 |
| 2023 | 2315 | 2331 | 2267 | 1622 |
| 2022 | 1870 | 2013 | 2017 | 1552 |
| 2021 | 1940 | 2126 | 1897 | 1458 |
| 2020 | 1582 | 1759 | 1571 | 969 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 36W / 33L / 3D | 41W / 33L / 5D | 90.9 |
| 2025 | 435W / 389L / 84D | 390W / 434L / 76D | 82.8 |
| 2024 | 487W / 323L / 77D | 477W / 359L / 59D | 70.0 |
| 2023 | 575W / 309L / 56D | 559W / 305L / 55D | 69.1 |
| 2022 | 280W / 223L / 36D | 278W / 219L / 44D | 69.9 |
| 2021 | 921W / 653L / 60D | 868W / 720L / 51D | 61.6 |
| 2020 | 972W / 1785L / 121D | 910W / 1886L / 109D | 44.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 752 | 382 | 332 | 38 | 50.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 420 | 191 | 207 | 22 | 45.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 418 | 220 | 191 | 7 | 52.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 389 | 133 | 242 | 14 | 34.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 311 | 127 | 171 | 13 | 40.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 248 | 100 | 138 | 10 | 40.3% |
| Scotch Game | 235 | 63 | 168 | 4 | 26.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 212 | 99 | 102 | 11 | 46.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 194 | 68 | 112 | 14 | 35.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 194 | 77 | 105 | 12 | 39.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 711 | 384 | 311 | 16 | 54.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 273 | 167 | 93 | 13 | 61.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 242 | 118 | 112 | 12 | 48.8% |
| French Defense | 194 | 97 | 88 | 9 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 154 | 73 | 68 | 13 | 47.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 140 | 65 | 68 | 7 | 46.4% |
| Australian Defense | 124 | 62 | 58 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 109 | 43 | 56 | 10 | 39.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 105 | 48 | 50 | 7 | 45.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 105 | 53 | 47 | 5 | 50.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 85 | 44 | 28 | 13 | 51.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 65 | 35 | 24 | 6 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 60 | 36 | 22 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Scotch Game | 47 | 19 | 28 | 0 | 40.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 42 | 17 | 20 | 5 | 40.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 37 | 18 | 13 | 6 | 48.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 37 | 20 | 15 | 2 | 54.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 33 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 48.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 30 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 27 | 16 | 6 | 5 | 59.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 38 | 13 | 0 | 74.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 44 | 39 | 4 | 1 | 88.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 65.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 68.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 41.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 91.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Elephant Gambit | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 40 | 2 |
| Losing | 49 | 0 |