David Anton Guijarro - Chess Grandmaster Extraordinaire
Meet David Anton Guijarro, also known in the chess arena by the enigmatic username tptagain. A Grandmaster certified by FIDE, David is a formidable force on the 64 squares, blending sharp tactical awareness with the patience of a saint and the wit of a sly fox.
Born to confuse opponents and delight chess fans, David's blitz rating soared to a staggering 3117 in October 2024 — not just a number, but a declaration of lightning-fast thinking and near-telepathic intuition. His bullet rating peaked just shy of the same brilliance at 3030, proving he's no stranger to ultra-fast games where one blink might mean checkmate.
When David plays, it’s not just a game—it’s a masterclass in strategy mixed with a pinch of flair:
- Win Rate in Blitz: A hearty 58% with the beloved "Top Secret" opening, which is anything but secret to his followers.
- Composure: Despite the high-pressure environment, his “tilt factor” is a humble 11, which means he gracefully handles losses and bounces back like a true champion.
- Stamina: Average wins stretch over 85 moves, a testament to his endurance and love for epic battles, whereas losses tend to go even longer, showing he fights to the last pawn.
- Comeback King: With an 86.8% comeback rate, David could probably win while simultaneously brewing a cup of tea.
Known for mixing up his openings like a grandmaster chef, David favors variations of the "Top Secret" opening in blitz, the "Indian Game Knights Variation" in rapid, and sprinkles in the "Caro Kann" like seasoning in bullet games. This diverse repertoire keeps opponents guessing and computers running hot trying to analyze.
Not just numbers and openings, David often shows his human side: he plays best around dawn (the highest win rate comes at 6 AM - apparently coffee and a fresh position are his secret weapons), and he's undefeated against players like hvillagra and chessicallyinclined, earning him a reputation as a relentless competitor with a knack for exploiting weaknesses.
Even when the clock is ticking down, David snatches victories by tricky timeouts — a fine blend of strategy and schadenfreude as opponents scramble frantically. For instance, in a recent quickfire duel against Bilan_Danila, he secured a win on time with flawless precision and nerves of steel.
Off the board, one can only imagine David’s life: perhaps a chess set in one hand, a coffee mug in the other, and a cheeky grin as he prepares to say, “Your move.”
In a world full of pawns, be a Grandmaster like David Anton Guijarro.
Recent Blitz Performance – Quick take
You’ve shown strong practical bite in blitz, with moments of sharp, tactical play that translate into decisive outcomes. The two wins demonstrate your ability to create, execute, and finish tactical sequences under pressure. The recent loss highlights a familiar blitz pattern: when you chase initiative too eagerly, it can invite counterplay or overextension. The key is to balance aggressive ideas with timely consolidation, especially when the clock tightens.
- You can finish off complex tactical sequences cleanly, as shown by the wins where you converted pressure into mate or winning material.
- When the position gets dynamic, you sometimes risk too much on the clock; a few safe, forcing lines can keep you in control and reduce impulsive decisions.
- In the opening and early middlegame, you’ve shown willingness to take the initiative. Pairing that with solid, time-efficient plan choices will help you convert more games in blitz.
Openings Performance Highlights
Your openings show a willingness to play aggressive, practical lines that keep pressure on the opponent. Here are some notable patterns and suggested refinements:
- Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack – strong overall score and high win rate. This suggests you’re comfortable generating active play and tactical chances early. Keep using it, but prepare a compact middlegame plan so you know how to convert the initiative if the attack slows down.
- Döry Defense – solid results. This line often leads to dynamic endgames; refine your typical middlegame ideas and piece placement to avoid drifting into passive structures under time pressure.
- East Indian Defense – strong results. Good for surprising opponents who expect more standard responses. Maintain a clear plan and be mindful of typical pawn breaks to keep space and activity.
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation – solid performance. If you encounter this structure, have a quick recall of key piece placements and typical tactical motifs to avoid slow setups.
Practical suggestion: in blitz, pick a compact, repeatable 2–3 line repertoire for each color. Having a short, confident plan reduces decision time and helps you convert advantages more reliably.
Rating and Trend interpretation
Short-term: a setback in the last month shows a dip, but longer-term data points to a positive trend. The three- and six-month changes indicate you’ve been grinding back toward stronger performance, and the year-long slope is still positive, suggesting ongoing improvement.
- Use the dip as a cue to tighten clock management in the first 15–20 moves and to establish a clear middlegame plan early.
- Leverage your longer-term momentum by incorporating short, focused review after blitz sessions to reinforce what works and drop what doesn’t.
Actionable 4-week Improvement Plan
Structured targets to convert more blitz opportunities into wins while preserving your energy on the clock.
- Week 1 – Tactics and clock discipline
- Daily: 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles focusing on forks, misdirections, and mating nets common in your chosen openings.
- Play 3–5 blitz games with explicit time checks; note any positions where you felt rushed and the decisions you made under 10 seconds.
- Week 2 – Endgame awareness and safe conversion
- Study rook endgames and simple king–pawn endings; practice converting small advantages in quick drills.
- In games, aim to simplify to favorable endgames when ahead, rather than seeking flashy but risky lines.
- Week 3 – Opening polish and quick plans
- Lock in 2–3 lines per color and write a one-liner middlegame plan for each (e.g., “activate the dark-squared bishop and target the kingside” or “keep the tension and prep a timely break”).
- Review 2 opponent games per day to see how their replies challenge your plan and where you spend time calculating.
- Week 4 – Blitz simulation and review
- Play a batch of 15–20 blitz games; immediately review each game focusing on where time was wasted and where you missed improving ideas.
- End each session with a quick 5-minute recap of the top 3 lessons learned.
Next steps and support
Keep leveraging your aggressive openings while sharpening time management and endgame technique. If you’d like, I can tailor a mini-repertoire and a 2-week drill plan based on your typical blitz opponents and preferred time controls.
See your profile for a quick reference to your recent activity: davidguijarro.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Rustemov | 181W / 99L / 45D | |
| 0blivi0usspy | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| Sergey And. Korshunov | 7W / 4L / 1D | |
| Oleg Vastrukhin | 10W / 8L / 1D | |
| Tamaz Mgeladze | 21W / 4L / 4D | |
| Reza Mahdavi | 6W / 7L / 4D | |
| Seo Jungmin | 2W / 5L / 5D | |
| shiningstar-07 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| ceferov-meherrem | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| mawrld0 | 1W / 3L / 2D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Rustemov | 181W / 99L / 45D | |
| Rudik Makarian | 65W / 55L / 16D | |
| Roman Zhenetl | 56W / 31L / 9D | |
| Sina Movahed | 44W / 32L / 5D | |
| Роман | 51W / 17L / 11D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3042 | 3084 | 2647 | |
| 2024 | 2994 | 3015 | 2648 | |
| 2023 | 2895 | 2972 | 2625 | |
| 2022 | 2909 | 2939 | 2573 | |
| 2021 | 2920 | 2990 | 2575 | |
| 2020 | 2954 | 2836 | 2606 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 961W / 315L / 150D | 879W / 393L / 159D | 90.9 |
| 2024 | 847W / 399L / 178D | 759W / 497L / 157D | 90.5 |
| 2023 | 638W / 338L / 136D | 579W / 386L / 137D | 92.0 |
| 2022 | 290W / 145L / 72D | 288W / 159L / 72D | 91.7 |
| 2021 | 109W / 47L / 29D | 96W / 65L / 20D | 86.6 |
| 2020 | 252W / 121L / 41D | 238W / 136L / 45D | 89.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 542 | 321 | 165 | 56 | 59.2% |
| Modern | 541 | 308 | 179 | 54 | 56.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 498 | 316 | 126 | 56 | 63.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 375 | 226 | 104 | 45 | 60.3% |
| Döry Defense | 323 | 198 | 82 | 43 | 61.3% |
| Modern Defense | 303 | 178 | 95 | 30 | 58.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 276 | 167 | 85 | 24 | 60.5% |
| East Indian Defense | 263 | 166 | 67 | 30 | 63.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 245 | 152 | 68 | 25 | 62.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 222 | 130 | 68 | 24 | 58.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Döry Defense | 80 | 53 | 21 | 6 | 66.2% |
| Australian Defense | 51 | 28 | 16 | 7 | 54.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 45 | 32 | 9 | 4 | 71.1% |
| Modern | 44 | 27 | 11 | 6 | 61.4% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 36 | 24 | 12 | 0 | 66.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 35 | 20 | 13 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 34 | 18 | 13 | 3 | 52.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 32 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 31 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 61.3% |
| French Defense | 30 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 46 | 19 | 15 | 12 | 41.3% |
| Döry Defense | 13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 61.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 22.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 55.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 28.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 28.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 28.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 2 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |