Andrey Tsvetkov - International Master Extraordinaire
Meet Andrey Tsvetkov, a chess maestro who has earned the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE. Known in many circles as tsvet2005, Andrey's journey through the 64 squares is nothing short of a rollercoaster thrill ride sprinkled with tactical genius and the occasional dramatic comeback.
Starting from a humble rating in the neighborhood of 1900 in blitz back in 2019, Andrey has blitzed his way up to an astonishing peak blitz rating of 2946 in November 2024 — which is basically the chess equivalent of climbing Everest with a knight in one hand and a queen in the other. His bullet games have also been electrifying, peaking near 2881, proving he’s just as fast as he is cunning.
With over a thousand blitz wins (1114 to be exact) and a penchant for launching relentless assaults in "Top Secret" openings, Andrey treats each game like a chess-themed blockbuster. His playing style is a curious mix of resilience and precision, with a delightful knack for comebacks boasting an 85.26% comeback rate. Losing a piece? No problem — Andrey’s win rate after losing a piece hovers around a respectable 43.17%, showing an unbreakable fighting spirit.
Andrey isn’t just a tactician; they’re a strategist who navigates the endgame labyrinth with an 83% frequency of endgames and an average of nearly 84 moves per win. And when under the gun, their early resignation rate is sensibly low (3.36%), proving that giving up isn’t really in their vocabulary.
Oh, and if you're wondering when the best time to challenge Andrey is, word on the street is that they play like a grandmaster before breakfast — their best playing hour is 5 AM, so set your alarms for some pre-dawn chess duels.
Off the board, Andrey maintains a whimsical aura. For instance, their longest winning streak is 13 games straight, but their current streak is a humble zero — proving even the best have days when the pawns just don’t listen.
Recent Battles
Noteworthy moments include a sharp victory using the Sicilian Defense Normal Line where they forced a resignation from an opponent rated 2825 — and that's not just good, that's IM-level excellence!
Even in losses, Andrey demonstrates fierce competition, engaging in nail-biting games often ending in checkmate only after a true test of wits and nerves.
Fun Facts
- Nickname: tsvet2005 (because who doesn’t love a username that sounds like a secret agent?)
- Win rate when playing white: 46.51% — fair and square!
- Comeback King: Bounces back from down situations over 85% of the time.
- Favorite type of game: Blitz, where they can unleash a flurry of moves faster than you can say "checkmate."
Andrey Tsvetkov is a name to watch, whether you’re a casual chess fan or a hardcore enthusiast. They blend tactical mastery, endurance, and just the right dash of whimsy — proving chess is as much about style as it is about substance.
Performance Overview
Andrey, your recent rapid games show a competitive playing strength with a strength adjusted win rate of approximately 47.5%. However, your rating has experienced a slight decrease of 12 points over the past month, three months, and six months. Despite this rating dip, your rating trend slopes over the past six and twelve months indicate positive improvement momentum.
Positives from Recent Games
- You have executed successful attacks in various openings such as the Benoni Defense and King's Indian Defense, demonstrating solid understanding of pawn structures and piece activity.
- Your endgame technique in some wins, for example against Mohammad Nubairshah Shaikh and Sreyas Payyappat, showed good calculation and use of material advantage to convert to victory.
- Strong play in complex middlegame positions was evident, including effective pressure on your opponent's king and timely exchanges that lead to favorable outcomes.
Areas for Improvement
- Several recent losses were decided before the late middlegame, often after minor inaccuracies or under pressure in the opening and early middlegame stages. [Opening refinement could help maintain balanced positions early on.]
- Play often involved tactical skirmishes around key central squares; focusing on tactical awareness and calculation speed will help you convert or defend these critical moments.
- In some lost games, opponents exploited weaknesses in pawn structure or piece coordination. Work on recognizing potential structural weaknesses and improving positional defense.
- Time management may be another element to monitor. In a rapid format, balancing accurate calculation with the clock is key, especially in critical positions.
Recommendations and Focus Areas
- Opening Study: Continue refining your repertoire, focusing on lines where you've gained advantages and understanding typical plans and pitfalls. For example, deepening knowledge in the Benoni Defense and Nimzo-Indian may yield more stability in opening phases.
- Tactical Exercises: Regular practice of tactics puzzles will enhance your calculation accuracy and help avoid losing minor details that often decide rapid games.
- Endgame Knowledge: Strengthen basic endgame fundamentals to improve confidence in converting winning positions, as several wins illustrate your potential here.
- Game Review: Keep reviewing your losses critically, particularly looking for recurring errors or weaknesses in specific phases or positions.
- Time Management: Try to allocate your time optimally. Avoid spending too long in familiar positions and save time for complex or unclear situations.
Closing Thoughts
Your progress is evident despite the small rating setback. The positive trend slopes in your rating history suggest that with focused study and practice, you can continue climbing. Keep leveraging your tactical skills and sharpening your opening knowledge while working to minimize early mistakes. With consistent effort, your results will improve over upcoming months.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colossus9000 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Amilal Munkhdalai | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Bharath Subramaniyam.H Harishankkar | 2W / 0L / 1D | |
| Daniel Garcia Ramos | 2W / 3L / 1D | |
| David Howell | 2W / 3L / 1D | |
| PrimusSanguisSeptimus | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Hamidreza Ebrahimi Herab | 3W / 3L / 1D | |
| Seo Jungmin | 3W / 1L / 3D | |
| soloadelante | 5W / 6L / 0D | |
| Yaacov Norowitz | 3W / 3L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Arystan Isanzhulov | 18W / 31L / 3D | |
| piliposyanrchess | 16W / 21L / 8D | |
| volodinalexandr | 21W / 15L / 7D | |
| Tigran Gharamian | 17W / 21L / 3D | |
| Nikita Afanasiev | 13W / 23L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2876 | 2961 | ||
| 2024 | 2761 | 2767 | 2426 | |
| 2023 | 2657 | 2438 | ||
| 2022 | 2740 | 2558 | ||
| 2021 | 2831 | 2771 | ||
| 2020 | 2723 | 2708 | 2302 | |
| 2019 | 2522 | 2602 | 2092 | 1396 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 144W / 128L / 39D | 135W / 140L / 30D | 86.6 |
| 2024 | 73W / 65L / 18D | 71W / 69L / 14D | 88.9 |
| 2023 | 17W / 15L / 5D | 19W / 16L / 2D | 81.9 |
| 2022 | 40W / 42L / 7D | 33W / 53L / 9D | 84.0 |
| 2021 | 127W / 151L / 26D | 138W / 148L / 25D | 88.3 |
| 2020 | 315W / 278L / 70D | 289W / 304L / 64D | 82.6 |
| 2019 | 135W / 121L / 19D | 119W / 121L / 36D | 84.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 186 | 89 | 84 | 13 | 47.9% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 174 | 85 | 69 | 20 | 48.9% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 105 | 57 | 44 | 4 | 54.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 101 | 40 | 45 | 16 | 39.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 96 | 43 | 36 | 17 | 44.8% |
| Slav Defense | 78 | 34 | 37 | 7 | 43.6% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 73 | 35 | 31 | 7 | 48.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 71 | 29 | 35 | 7 | 40.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 69 | 24 | 34 | 11 | 34.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 61 | 30 | 25 | 6 | 49.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 58 | 29 | 26 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 53 | 23 | 26 | 4 | 43.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 49 | 20 | 24 | 5 | 40.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 40 | 17 | 19 | 4 | 42.5% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 32 | 12 | 18 | 2 | 37.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 30 | 13 | 13 | 4 | 43.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 29 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 62.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 28 | 5 | 20 | 3 | 17.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 26 | 11 | 13 | 2 | 42.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 26 | 11 | 14 | 1 | 42.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |