Matthew Larson (Username: Viaje)
International Master of Chess
Matthew Larson, known online by the enigmatic handle Viaje, is a force to be reckoned with in the digital chess arena. Awarded the prestigious title of International Master by FIDE, Matthew has proven time and again that a combination of sharp tactics, relentless endgame precision, and a pinch of chess wizardry can consistently break through defenses worldwide.
Starting their blitz journey in 2013 with a modest rating around 1300, Matthew's climb has been nothing short of meteoric. By April 2025, they reached an impressive peak blitz rating of 2526, showcasing an explosive passion for quick, sharp play — as if the chessboard were a fast-paced video game and every second counted.
Chess Style & Stats
- Win Rate in Blitz: A robust 64.6% over more than 1,500 games, proving time pressure is their playground.
- Bullet Mastery: Peak bullet rating of 2609, with a win rate above 71% — lightning-fast reflections perfected over thousands of games.
- Rapid and Daily: Not just speed, but composure too: rapid rating maxed near 2507, and even a flawless daily game record (well, at least one game undefeated).
- Longest Winning Streak: An astounding 113 consecutive wins - a streak that probably made opponents double-check their keyboards for bugs.
- Psychological Edge: Known for resilience, with a comeback rate over 74%. Losing a piece isn’t a defeat for Matthew but a tactical dare.
Signature Openings and Memorable Games
Whether storming the board with bold d4 pushes or calmly orchestrating the Slav Defense’s complexities, Matthew’s opening repertoire is a carefully guarded treasure. Their most played and successful opening remains a “Top Secret” weapon - likely a code name for mystifying opponents before the first move.
In one recent blitz game from April 2, 2025, Matthew (playing white) crushed the opposition using the Slav Defense Modern Line, sealing victory on time after a strategic dance of calculated exchanges and pressure. The game was a masterclass in patience and precision, ending with a well-timed queen invasion forcing resignation — a perfect reflection of their style: strategic, sharp, and always a few moves ahead.
Personality Snapshot
With a tilt factor comfortably low at 9, Matthew balances fierce competition with calm. Their best creative bursts seem to appear at sunrise (6 AM, to be exact) — proof that chess genius needs its coffee as much as its analysis. Averaging just over 64 moves in victories implies games that are as thrilling as Netflix thriller series, while their losses tend to linger longer, showing their dogged endurance against even the toughest foes.
Matthew's chess story is one of steady climbs, electrifying win streaks, and a personality that embraces both the chaos and artistry of chess. Whether blitzing online or slowly unraveling endgames, Viaje remains an unforgettable competitor whose games are part science, part performance art, and all heart.
Feedback for Matthew Larson
Matthew, I've reviewed your recent games and have some constructive insights to help elevate your play:
Strengths
- Opening Preparation: You show good knowledge of popular openings like the Slav Defense, Catalan, and Modern Defense. Your move choices in the opening are sound and help you reach balanced middlegame positions.
- Positional Understanding: You frequently develop pieces harmoniously and control important central squares. Moves like carefully timed pawn breaks and piece maneuvers demonstrate good strategic awareness.
- Endgame Technique: You've converted some complex endgames successfully, showing you understand the importance of king activity and precise calculation under pressure.
Areas for Improvement
- Tactical Awareness: In some games, such as the recent loss against Papik_Z, the critical moment came when tactical miscalculations led to losing material or a decisive attack. Spend time reviewing missed tactics and strengthening pattern recognition to avoid these costly oversights.
- Time Management: You won a few games on time, which suggests some time pressure situations. Try to allocate your clock better, especially in complicated positions. Slow down a little in critical moments to ensure you don’t overlook essential moves.
- Handling Pressure in Complex Positions: In a couple of losses, the positions became dynamically challenging (such as in Sicilian structures), and inaccuracies crept in. Practice visualization and calculation under complexity to maintain composure and find best resources consistently.
- Attack and Defense Balance: There are moments when you commit aggressively, which is good, but balancing attack with sufficient defense or prophylaxis could improve resilience. Evaluate your opponent’s counterplay threats before launching forward aggressively.
Recommendations
- Review the recent loss [[Link|game|Papik_Z]] carefully and identify key turning points where tactics slipped away.
- Incorporate daily tactical puzzles into your training to sharpen calculation speed and accuracy.
- Analyze your time usage patterns and practice playing with a fixed increment or longer time controls to build comfort in complex positions.
- Study middlegame plans in your preferred openings to deepen strategic understanding and enhance your decision-making.
Keep up the good work and stay consistent in your training! You’re making solid progress, and addressing these areas will help you reach 2526 (2025-04-02) and beyond.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| clara4709 | 714W / 16L / 2D | |
| emperorwei | 79W / 0L / 1D | |
| sicilianfan | 57W / 3L / 1D | |
| lakersfan102 | 29W / 0L / 0D | |
| disobedientavocado | 16W / 0L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2601 | 2515 | ||
| 2024 | 2524 | |||
| 2023 | 2502 | |||
| 2022 | 2477 | 2502 | 2478 | |
| 2021 | 2388 | 2404 | 2450 | |
| 2020 | 2529 | 2392 | 2450 | |
| 2019 | 2409 | 2332 | ||
| 2018 | 2401 | 2388 | ||
| 2017 | 2241 | 2253 | 2151 | |
| 2016 | 2114 | 2237 | 2362 | |
| 2015 | 2162 | 2362 | 2000 | |
| 2014 | 1996 | 2099 | 2214 | |
| 2013 | 1811 | 1949 | 1439 | |
| 2012 | 1688 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15W / 6L / 0D | 13W / 8L / 1D | 80.4 |
| 2024 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 85.0 |
| 2023 | 9W / 0L / 0D | 9W / 0L / 0D | 46.6 |
| 2022 | 81W / 30L / 9D | 72W / 36L / 9D | 76.4 |
| 2021 | 116W / 64L / 17D | 93W / 80L / 19D | 76.3 |
| 2020 | 242W / 122L / 15D | 201W / 143L / 33D | 57.6 |
| 2019 | 28W / 5L / 0D | 25W / 8L / 2D | 65.5 |
| 2018 | 156W / 57L / 8D | 139W / 69L / 11D | 77.3 |
| 2017 | 300W / 11L / 5D | 287W / 20L / 3D | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 113W / 15L / 1D | 97W / 26L / 2D | 64.2 |
| 2015 | 22W / 15L / 2D | 11W / 23L / 4D | 82.4 |
| 2014 | 35W / 14L / 2D | 21W / 25L / 5D | 80.3 |
| 2013 | 61W / 38L / 4D | 60W / 41L / 4D | 77.2 |
| 2012 | 7W / 2L / 0D | 6W / 2L / 0D | 76.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 195 | 115 | 80 | 0 | 59.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 72 | 51 | 17 | 4 | 70.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 50 | 29 | 20 | 1 | 58.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 48 | 33 | 13 | 2 | 68.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 45 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 48.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 35 | 31 | 3 | 1 | 88.6% |
| Catalan Opening | 34 | 25 | 7 | 2 | 73.5% |
| Benko Gambit | 34 | 22 | 9 | 3 | 64.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 29 | 11 | 14 | 4 | 37.9% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 28 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 445 | 359 | 74 | 12 | 80.7% |
| Modern | 291 | 209 | 71 | 11 | 71.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 131 | 91 | 32 | 8 | 69.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 123 | 86 | 29 | 8 | 69.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 105 | 77 | 23 | 5 | 73.3% |
| Czech Defense | 82 | 64 | 16 | 2 | 78.0% |
| Australian Defense | 44 | 20 | 20 | 4 | 45.5% |
| East Indian Defense | 27 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 26 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 65.4% |
| Modern Defense | 19 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 52.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 113 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |