Biography
VLADO V.. is a blitz chess enthusiast whose online journey began in 2013. From a modest start around 1300 blitz rating, the player steadily climbed the ladder and reached a peak around the mid-2400s, with a standout blitz peak of 2464 in 2024. Known for quick thinking, fearless tactics, and a fondness for rapid-fire decisions, VLADO V.. treats blitz as a playground where creativity often outpaces caution.
Preferred Time Control
Blitz is the arena where VLADO V.. shines. The profile indicates Blitz as the preferred time control, a setting where rapid calculation and bold, patented ideas come to life.
Opening Repertoire
VLADO V.. favors a dynamic blitz repertoire with a penchant for sharp, unorthodox lines. Notable choices include:
- Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit
- Scandinavian Defense
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Caro-Kann Defense
- French Defense: Burn Variation
- Ruy Lopez: Bird's Defense Deferred
- French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation
- Sicilian Defense
- Sicilian Defense: Closed
Career Highlights
- Longest Winning Streak: 14 games
- Peak Blitz Rating: 2464 (September 2024)
- Endgame Frequency: endgames appear frequently, a hallmark of the player's resilience
- Comeback Resilience: Comeback Rate around 88.72%
- High-volume blitz seasons around 2020–2021 with strong activity and results
Trivia
Tips from the data: Best Time of Day to Play is 05:00, and the tilt factor is modest, suggesting a cool-headed approach even when the clock is ticking fast.
Visual Timeline
Chart snapshot placeholder:
Peak rating spotlight: 2464 (2024-09-01)
Overview of recent blitz performance and momentum
Your recent blitz activity shows a positive short-term shift but some longer-term drift. Here’s how to think about the numbers you shared:
- 1 month rating change: +105 points indicates a strong short-term push and good momentum over the last few weeks.
- 3 month rating change: +59 points confirms that momentum carried forward, though not as sharply as the 1-month figure.
- 6 month rating change: -55 points shows a slowdown and a negative trend over a longer horizon, suggesting some fatigue or tougher challenges over half a year.
- 12 month rating trend slope: about -10.9 indicates a longer-term downward drift. This can happen with heavier schedules or tougher opponents over time, but it doesn’t erase the recent gains you’ve made.
Takeaway: your short-term form is strong, but to sustain progress, aim for steadier long-term consistency. Pair that momentum with disciplined routines to reduce bumps over multi-month windows.
What you’re doing well in blitz
- Active, tactical play: you’re comfortable entering sharp middlegames and creating practical chances. Your willingness to complicate positions can overwhelm opponents who rely on comfort and memorized lines.
- Endgame resourcefulness: in several games you navigated toward endings where your understanding of practical conversions paid off, even when the position was complex.
- Clock awareness in some wins: you’ve shown you can capitalize on the opponent’s time pressure and finish debates cleanly when you keep a steady pace.
- Openings that suit your style: you have experience with a mix of flexible systems, giving you chances to outplay opponents in the early middlegame.
Key improvement areas to target
- Time management under pressure: set deliberate thinking milestones for the first 8–12 moves. If you’re low on time, switch to simpler, solid plans rather than risking speculative lines.
- Solidify a compact opening repertoire: pick 1–2 reliable lines for White and Black that you’re very comfortable with in blitz. This reduces decision fatigue and keeps you out of heavy theoretical traps.
- Pattern recognition and calculation depth: in dynamic positions, practice spotting 2–3 tactical motifs you can rely on (double attacks, deflections, forks) to avoid missing forcing lines.
- Endgame consolidation: when you’re ahead, aim to simplify to rook or minor-piece endings you know well. When behind, look for practical drawing chances through activity and perpetual ideas rather than risky sacrificial attempts.
- Post-game review routine: after each blitz game, quickly note (a) the critical turning point, (b) any blunders under time, and (c) one improvement for the same situation next time.
Openings performance snapshot and plan
Your openings performance shows strengths in several flexible systems and some caution with highly theoretical lines. Highlights and practical advice:
- Scandinavian Defense: win rate around 51.7%. Good practical choice for blitz—solid, less theory-heavy than some other defenses. Consider using it as a main option when you’re facing 1.e4 and want a straightforward, active game for faster plans.
- Sicilian defenses (various lines): average around low- to mid-50s in some sub-branches, but some lines (e.g., Najdorf, Sicilian Defense: Closed) show tighter results. If you enjoy aggressive play, keep a couple of reliable Sicilian setups, but pair them with clear triggers to avoid overextension in blitz.
- Alapin Variation and other solid systems (e.g., French-related lines, Bird’s Defense): around 50%+ win rates. These can be good for steady, less error-prone play in blitz; consider adopting them as complementary options to balance risk and reduce fatigue from heavy theory.
- Najdorf/Najdorf-family lines and some highly tactical Sicilian branches tend to be riskier in blitz. Use them selectively, preferably after a few solid moves in the opening when you have a clear plan.
Practical takeaway: choose a tight, 2–3 opening families you truly understand, practice the core middlegame ideas from them, and use them as your blitz “default” so you can spend more time on calculation later in the game.
Rating trends and a practical improvement plan
To build on your current momentum and stabilize long-term results, try this focused plan:
- Weekly focus: pick 2 opening lines (one for White, one for Black) to study deeply. Create a short “move-depth” cheat sheet you can rely on in blitz. Practice 10–15 named lines per week, not dozens of marginal offshoots.
- Daily tactics sprint: dedicate 15–20 minutes to tactical puzzles emphasizing common blitz motifs (forks, skewers, back-rank issues, mating nets) to raise your calculation speed without sacrificing accuracy.
- Endgame drills: run rook endgames and simple king-and-pawn endings, focusing on activity and king safety. Blitz endgames favor activity over material, so practice converting or defending with active king and rooks.
- Post-game drill: after each blitz session, briefly annotate 1 key mistake and 1 improvement in your notes. If possible, review the game with a quick engine check only to confirm critical miscalculations rather than chasing long lines.
- Time-control discipline: set a fixed thinking budget per phase (e.g., 15–20 seconds for the first 8 moves, then re-evaluate). If you’re at 20 seconds per move near move 25, switch to solid, safe moves and aim to reach a reliable endgame.
A quick, concrete next-week agenda
- Lock in two openings: Scandinavian as Black against 1.e4; a simple, solid system (e.g., Queen’s Gambit Declined or Caro-Kann) as White against 1.d4. Prepare one sharp, one solid line for variety.
- Complete 5 tactical sets this week: forks, double attacks, pin-and-win patterns. Do 3 puzzles daily, with a 2-minute post-puzzle reflection.
- Endgame focus: 2 rook endgames and 1 basic king-and-pawn endgame drill session this week.
- Post-game review ritual: after each blitz game, write 1 improvement note and 1 thing you did well.
Optional quick reference
Placeholder note: If you want, I can attach a short opening reference file or a few training Pgn/anotation samples tailored to your current openings. Just say the word and I’ll add them here for easy access on mobile. VLADO V.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| wilenczyk | 57W / 50L / 17D | View Games |
| Bruce Monson | 48W / 65L / 10D | View Games |
| kanielc | 61W / 43L / 17D | View Games |
| Artak1996 Artak | 61W / 49L / 8D | View Games |
| Gregory Kilishek | 64W / 39L / 10D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2370 | |||
| 2024 | 2335 | |||
| 2023 | 2288 | |||
| 2022 | 2401 | |||
| 2021 | 2305 | |||
| 2020 | 2379 | |||
| 2019 | 2325 | |||
| 2018 | 2221 | |||
| 2017 | 2220 | |||
| 2016 | 2154 | |||
| 2015 | 2027 | |||
| 2014 | 2064 | |||
| 2013 | 2077 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 570W / 406L / 105D | 475W / 504L / 94D | 80.9 |
| 2024 | 647W / 477L / 116D | 581W / 536L / 118D | 82.5 |
| 2023 | 551W / 396L / 100D | 482W / 464L / 115D | 83.0 |
| 2022 | 579W / 476L / 131D | 548W / 505L / 125D | 82.5 |
| 2021 | 951W / 829L / 188D | 857W / 895L / 228D | 82.3 |
| 2020 | 1118W / 969L / 223D | 959W / 1110L / 250D | 81.7 |
| 2019 | 441W / 382L / 87D | 397W / 416L / 99D | 80.6 |
| 2018 | 479W / 444L / 71D | 422W / 475L / 102D | 78.4 |
| 2017 | 367W / 327L / 63D | 357W / 352L / 55D | 79.6 |
| 2016 | 397W / 391L / 51D | 395W / 384L / 79D | 79.2 |
| 2015 | 304W / 276L / 48D | 285W / 292L / 57D | 79.9 |
| 2014 | 319W / 294L / 65D | 311W / 293L / 65D | 83.2 |
| 2013 | 140W / 109L / 26D | 141W / 110L / 24D | 82.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2310 | 1119 | 966 | 225 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1040 | 534 | 409 | 97 | 51.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1000 | 519 | 395 | 86 | 51.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 974 | 503 | 375 | 96 | 51.6% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 883 | 446 | 365 | 72 | 50.5% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 698 | 361 | 265 | 72 | 51.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird's Defense Deferred | 697 | 352 | 276 | 69 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 652 | 278 | 312 | 62 | 42.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 575 | 238 | 266 | 71 | 41.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 494 | 216 | 238 | 40 | 43.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 2 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |