William Hernandez Gonzalez - International Master
Known in the chess world as Willychess95, William Hernandez Gonzalez is no ordinary strategist—he’s an International Master who dances on the board like a grandmaster with just a hint of flair and a dash of mischief.
Career Highlights & Stats
- Peak Blitz Rating: A spectacular 2889 in 2023, proving that lightning-fast reflexes and sharp tactics are his forte.
- Impressive Bullet Skills: Max rating of 2680, showing that William can handle the heat in the fastest formats.
- Rapid & Daily Play: Though his Rapid rating maxes out around 2616 and Daily battles are fewer (with ratings hovering near 1800), he’s always ready for a slower, more contemplative bout.
Playing Style
William isn’t one to surrender quickly; with an early resignation rate under 1%, he fights tooth and nail through the endgame, boasting an 82.6% endgame frequency. A true fighter, his average moves per win or loss hover around 80—because patience is a virtue, especially when outwitting opponents.
White pieces yield him nearly a 49% win rate, while Black provides a respectable 43%. If he loses a piece, don’t count him out—he bounces back with a 100% win rate after such setbacks. Talk about turning lemons into chess lemonade!
The Psychological Warrior
With a tilt factor of just 16, William keeps his cool better than most, even when the chips are down. His rated versus casual win difference is a mere 2.08%, showing he’s just as deadly whether the stakes are large or small.
Notable Records & Rivalries
His winning streak once stretched to a staggering 34 games—imagine that mindset! His most-played opponent is bswpaulsen, with 155 intense duels fought over the years. Some rivals see a 0% win rate when going up against Willy, but others aren't so lucky—like interimtim, who got a 100% drubbing.
A Note on Personality
Willychess95 is not just about stats—his online presence and the sheer volume of games played (tens of thousands in blitz alone) suggest a true chess addict and enthusiast. Whether outmaneuvering opponents or just having a laugh with fellow players, William brings both skill and a touch of humor to the 64 squares.
In sum, William Hernandez Gonzalez is a tenacious, clever, and versatile chess warrior—one who proves that chess is not just a game, but an epic saga of battles fought with wit and wisdom.
Hi William (“Willychess95”) 👋
Congratulations on maintaining a 2889 (2023-09-21) above 2600! Your tactical alertness and willingness to seize the initiative make you a dangerous opponent in short time controls. Below you’ll find an objective snapshot of recurring strengths and improvement areas based on your most recent games.
What you already do well
- Fast tactical vision. Wins against strong players (e.g. Denis Trifonov and InterimTim) show clean exploitation of loose back-rank squares and overloaded pieces. The sequence 29…Neg4+!! in your Najdorf win illustrates this nicely.
- Pressure with the initiative. You’re comfortable sacrificing pawns (Wing Gambit, Alekhine Kmoch line) to keep the opponent on the back foot. This is perfect for 3-minute blitz.
- Resourceful rook activity in endgames. In the Alekhine win you converted a rook ending with only seconds left, constantly pushing the passed d-pawn while restricting Black’s king.
Key improvement themes
1. A sturdier defence vs 1.d4 systems
Three of your four latest losses came from d4 openings (Old Benoni, Catalan, E00 set-up). In each case an early pawn thrust (…h5, …f5, or …c5 without full development) left dark-square holes that White exploited.
- Instead of the Benoni set-up you tried against Denis Trifonov, consider adding a more solid option such as the Slav or Queen’s Gambit Declined while you study Benoni middlegame plans.
- Revisit typical exchange-sac ideas on c5 or e4 in the Catalan. You allowed g4–g5/f4-f5 without counterplay.
2. Pawn-structure discipline
Your aggressive style sometimes overextends kingside pawns. During the Pseudo-Catalan loss you pushed …h5–h4 with pieces undeveloped, creating permanent dark-square weaknesses (diagram after 20…Rfd8).
- Adopt the rule of thumb “push the rook pawn only when two pieces defend the square you leave.”
- When in doubt, develop one more piece before launching a pawn storm.
3. Conversion technique in favourable positions
You resigned in the Semi-Benoni after 37.g5 even though material was equal and Black’s pawns were healthier. Use engine analysis to verify whether the position was still drawable — it often is!
4. Clock management
The time-forfeit against Traktor666 and the frantic endings in several wins suggest a pattern: strong middlegame play followed by seconds-left conversion. Try:
- Spending at most 30 seconds on the opening phase — rely on prep.
- Setting a mental “time-checkpoint” around move 20 (≥45 s ideal).
Targeted training plan
- Opening tune-up (d4 repertoire). Watch one model game daily on the solid line you choose and summarise the pawn-chain plans in a notebook.
- Endgame mini-sessions. 15 minutes/day on rook-and-pawn endings. Start with the classic Lucena & Philidor then practise with the interactive drills in your preferred app.
- Tactics under time-pressure. Three sets of 10 puzzles at 60 seconds each. This simulates blitz calculation and cements pattern recognition.
- Self-review routine. After each session, tag three moments:
- “Best move” (keep doing this)
- “Unnecessary pawn push”
- “Slow move” (took >15 s in blitz)
Illustrative moment
The following fragment from your Semi-Benoni loss captures the double-edged nature of your style. Black is fine after 25…Rxd5, but 29…Rd4? lets White liquidate into a healthy passer:
Notice how the rook exchange fixes the pawn weakness on b4 and leaves you without counterplay. In similar positions keep major pieces to maintain dynamism.
Progress tracker
Monitor your improvement with the built-in dashboards:
Keep up the great work!
Your creativity and fighting spirit already set you apart. By tightening the positional screws and managing your clock just a bit better, you’ll break through the next rating ceiling. Good luck, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| BSWPaulsen | 65W / 67L / 23D | View Games |
| Khatanbaatar Bazar | 55W / 72L / 17D | View Games |
| r31415 | 47W / 44L / 6D | View Games |
| David Arutinian | 24W / 55L / 14D | View Games |
| ErnestoGuevaraLynch | 44W / 28L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2610 | |||
| 2024 | 2617 | |||
| 2023 | 2511 | 2655 | 2262 | 1466 |
| 2022 | 2651 | 2688 | 2206 | 1852 |
| 2021 | 2475 | 2703 | 2404 | 1812 |
| 2020 | 2503 | 2557 | 2477 | |
| 2019 | 2213 | 2626 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7W / 5L / 0D | 5W / 6L / 0D | 80.3 |
| 2024 | 7W / 9L / 1D | 7W / 9L / 2D | 79.5 |
| 2023 | 653W / 665L / 119D | 586W / 696L / 125D | 83.9 |
| 2022 | 1344W / 1294L / 214D | 1195W / 1377L / 260D | 84.9 |
| 2021 | 1173W / 1076L / 171D | 983W / 1254L / 175D | 84.3 |
| 2020 | 727W / 626L / 120D | 620W / 688L / 126D | 85.0 |
| 2019 | 896W / 661L / 117D | 759W / 785L / 82D | 75.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 830 | 415 | 356 | 59 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 767 | 370 | 336 | 61 | 48.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 727 | 371 | 320 | 36 | 51.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 490 | 219 | 239 | 32 | 44.7% |
| French Defense | 480 | 265 | 179 | 36 | 55.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 474 | 180 | 255 | 39 | 38.0% |
| Döry Defense | 467 | 217 | 215 | 35 | 46.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 451 | 184 | 235 | 32 | 40.8% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 411 | 159 | 211 | 41 | 38.7% |
| Petrov's Defense | 381 | 156 | 180 | 45 | 40.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 6 | 16 | 0 | 27.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 89 | 45 | 41 | 3 | 50.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 82 | 48 | 33 | 1 | 58.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 78 | 37 | 37 | 4 | 47.4% |
| French Defense | 68 | 40 | 27 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 67 | 35 | 30 | 2 | 52.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 58 | 30 | 22 | 6 | 51.7% |
| Czech Defense | 52 | 23 | 27 | 2 | 44.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 52 | 19 | 28 | 5 | 36.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 51 | 26 | 25 | 0 | 51.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 48 | 25 | 21 | 2 | 52.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Paulsen Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 34 | 0 |
| Losing | 16 | 1 |