Ramazan Zhalmakhanov - Grandmaster Extraordinaire
Meet Ramazan Zhalmakhanov, a chess Grandmaster who’s been smashing pawns and kings with a flair only few can match. From a humble Blitz rating of just 1000 back in 2020, Ramazan zoomed up to an eye-popping peak above 3000! If lightning-fast moves were a superpower, Ramazan would be the superhero you’d call when checkmate is imminent.
Notorious for his relentless endgame prowess (he stays glued to the board in 82.42% of his games), he has an uncanny ability to storm back from the brink with a comeback rate of 92.05%. Basically, if Ramazan loses a piece, it’s the start of the opponent’s nightmare — he boasts a 100% win rate after losing material. Opponents beware!
As versatile as a Swiss Army knife, Ramazan has dabbled and conquered in Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid formats, favoring undoubtedly high-paced battles where his tactical awareness shines. His secret “Top Secret” opening strategy has netted him more wins than coffee-fueled late-night study sessions can count.
A strategic genius with a winning streak besting 10 games in a row, Ramazan knows when to push forward and when to quit early (early resignation rate sits comfortably low at 1.79%, proving he’s got patience and grit). With a strong preference for playing the black pieces (earning nearly 60% win rate), he flips the board script and makes opponents sweat.
Beyond the stats, Ramazan’s psychological resilience is notable — his tilt factor is low, demonstrating calm under fire, and he’s as welcoming to long battles as he is to sudden strikes. When it comes to opponents, he's racked up some impressive win rates, highlighted by notable victories over a slew of distinguished challengers.
Whether it’s a Sunday afternoon or a late-night showdown at 2 AM (yes, he posts a perfect 100% win rate then), Ramazan’s presence on the digital battlefield is as formidable as a knight charging through the cloudy ranks.
Performance snapshot
You’ve shown a positive long‑term trajectory across several time scales, with notable strength in the middle game and a willingness to fight for dynamic chances. There was a recent month with a rating drop, but the longer horizons indicate steady improvement. In blitz, this kind of pattern—short-term blips alongside rising trend lines—often points to the need for tighter time management and clearer endgame conversion, rather than a fundamental flaw in your thinking.
What you’re doing well
- Comfort with aggressive, tactical openings that create practical problems for opponents. Your performance with sharp lines like Modern Defense and aggressive setups (Amazon Attack family) shows you can seize initiative and press for material or positional advantages.
- Good activity and piece coordination in the middlegame. You tend to chase active plans and keep pressure on the opponent’s position, which can lead to extra chances in blitz where precise calculation time is limited.
- Resilience in dynamic positions where you’re the one initiating complications. This willingness to complicate often yields practical winning chances in fast time controls.
Areas to improve
- Time management in the blitz phase. Your one‑month change suggests some stability in effort, but there are moments where you spend too long on dubious lines. Work on a quick, robust decision process for sharp positions and have a ready plan when you’re unsure.
- Endgame conversion. In several recent games, the clash moves into endings where precise technique matters more than raw calculation. Strengthen rook endings and minor piece endgames, focusing on simple, proven plans rather than chasing complications.
- Calculation discipline in heavy tactics. When the board is crowded with tactical motifs, double‑check critical lines and consider safer, forcing continuations first. This helps reduce blunders in fast time controls.
- Consistent opening readiness. While you have strong openings, a small portion of games drift into unfamiliar middlegame structures. Build a compact, two‑line repertoire for blitz and study the typical middlegame plans and pawn structures that arise from those lines.
Opening performance snapshot
Your data shows strong results from several active lines, notably Modern Defense and Amazon Attack family systems. These lines reward quick, principled decisions and clash scenarios that suit blitz. A couple of suggestions:
- Lean into your best performers. Continue to deepen understanding of Modern Defense ideas and Amazon Attack plans, focusing on typical middlegame structures, standard pawn breaks, and the key tactical motifs you’re already comfortable with.
- Develop a concise two‑opening plan for blitz. Pick Modern Defense and Amazon Attack (or one other strong line you’re comfortable with) and create a short, repeatable approach to the most common middlegame themes you’ll face in blitz.
- Study a few exchange patterns and endgames from your recent games. Knowing the simplest route to convert wins in rook or minor‑piece endings will help you turn advantage into points under time pressure.
Plan for the next two weeks
- Daily: 15–20 minutes of focused tactics puzzles, emphasizing back‑rank motifs, forks, and common blitz traps to sharpen quick calculation.
- 2–3 sessions per week: Deep dive into Modern Defense and Amazon Attack lines. Learn the core middlegame plans, typical pawn structures, and the most important thematic breaks you should aim for.
- Endgame practice: 2 short sessions each week on rook endgames and king‑and‑pawn endings. Practice converting a material edge into a win with simple, repeatable techniques.
- Game review routine: After every blitz session, pick two games (one win, one loss or draw) and annotate them for three concrete takeaways (a stronger plan, a moment of time pressure, and an endgame transition).
- Time management drill: In practice games, aim to reach critical decision points with at least 2–3 minutes left on the clock for the final phase. If you’re ahead on the clock, simplify to reduce risk.
- Weekly checkpoint: Note the mood of your games (confident, neutral, or rushed) to identify patterns that lead to mistakes. Use those insights to adjust pace strategy in future games.
Notes from recent games (high‑level takeaways)
The most recent win shows you can steer an ambitious middlegame plan to a clean conversion when Black’s defense loosens. The losses and draws suggest working on consistency in the transition from middlegame to endgame, and ensuring you keep pressure while not overextending in unproven lines. A practical next step is to reinforce a few solid endgame routes in your chosen openings, so you can convert advantages with calm technique even when the clock is tight.
Momentum and consistency note
Longer‑term trends remain positive, with steady growth over multiple horizons. Maintain the rhythm that’s driving improvement: targeted study of your strongest openings, disciplined endgame practice, and a time‑management framework that helps you stay sharp when the clock is ticking.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Artin Ashraf | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Blitz_Expert23 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| chef_zohid | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Oleg Vastrukhin | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| GZQSH07 | 3W / 1L / 1D | |
| Aleksei Sarana | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Hamidreza Ebrahimi Herab | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Seo Jungmin | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| Trig_King | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| vovachesss | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nihal Sarin | 6W / 12L / 1D | |
| Maksim Tsaruk | 6W / 9L / 1D | |
| Валерий Свиридов | 11W / 4L / 1D | |
| Arystan Isanzhulov | 10W / 4L / 0D | |
| Roman Zhenetl | 5W / 8L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2890 | 3045 | ||
| 2024 | 2865 | 2980 | 2258 | |
| 2023 | 2872 | 2943 | ||
| 2022 | 2904 | 2916 | ||
| 2021 | 2678 | 2930 | ||
| 2020 | 1216 | 2258 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 58W / 41L / 9D | 57W / 42L / 3D | 91.5 |
| 2024 | 84W / 65L / 10D | 84W / 61L / 11D | 94.8 |
| 2023 | 38W / 12L / 3D | 30W / 17L / 6D | 82.1 |
| 2022 | 52W / 31L / 8D | 56W / 28L / 5D | 83.4 |
| 2021 | 14W / 4L / 1D | 18W / 0L / 1D | 79.6 |
| 2020 | 31W / 9L / 6D | 30W / 9L / 6D | 75.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 45 | 33 | 10 | 2 | 73.3% |
| Modern | 41 | 28 | 13 | 0 | 68.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 27 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 63.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 26 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 26 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 38.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 22 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Czech Defense | 17 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 52.9% |
| Modern Defense | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 58.8% |
| East Indian Defense | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 41.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 18 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 28.6% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 6 | 2 |