Zurab Tqebuchava - International Master of Chess
Known in the chess community as ZuraTqebuchava, Zurab is not just any player; he is an esteemed International Master, a title awarded by FIDE that proves he's cracked the code of the royal game better than most.
Tracing his rapid rating journey from a humble 1361 in 2020 to an impressive peak of 2432 in 2024, Zurab's ascent is the stuff of chess legend. Consistently battling it out in hundreds of games each year — we're talking 691 rapid games in 2024 alone — he shows both stamina and passion for the board.
With lightning-fast reflexes, Zurab also dominates the blitz scene, where his peak rating climbed up to 2383 in 2024. And while bullet chess isn’t exactly his favorite knight’s gambit (maxing just above 1100), it’s clear he prefers a bit more thinking time before delivering that checkmate.
Playing Style & Mindset
Zurab approaches chess like a grandmaster tactician who also appreciates a good comeback story — boasting an 88% comeback rate and undefeated when down a piece (yes, really, 100% win rate after losing a piece!). This might explain his average wins lasting around 78 moves, proving he loves a drawn-out battle rather than a quick conquest.
Although his "tilt factor" clocks in at 14 (chess players might want to keep an eye on that during a losing streak), Zura famously ends games with impressive endgame precision, demonstrated by playing endgames in nearly 85% of his games.
Notable Streaks & Fun Facts
His longest winning streak is an admirable 11 games, a feat that certainly sent shivers down his opponents' spines.
This strategist also battles most successfully on Fridays and early morning hours (6 AM anyone?), where his win rate climbs above 50%, probably while most humans are still hitting snooze.
Enemies & Allies at the Board
Zurab’s recent opponents include the likes of pilzerich, muratmxh, and evilkingslayer3000 — intimidating usernames that seem perfectly suited to the battlefield of 64 squares.
And he even dominates some of them with 100% win rates, proving foes beware: when Zurab’s on the board, the kings are not safe.
In Summary
Whether it’s the rapid, blitz, or daily game he’s attacking, Zurab Tqebuchava brings experience, endurance, and an almost superhero-like resilience to the table. He doesn’t just play chess; he lives it — piece by calculated piece, move by move, with the cunning of a true International Master.
Quick summary
Nice work — your tactical alertness and endgame technique are clear in recent wins (you converted passed pawns and executed a mating net). The biggest recurring issue is time management: several losses were decided on the clock. Below are focused, practical steps to keep your strengths and fix the weak spots.
Highlights — what you're doing well
- Endgame technique: you turn advanced passed pawns into promotions and use the king actively. Those technical wins are a real asset.
- Tactical awareness: you spot back-rank/king-side weaknesses quickly (example: your quick Qxf7 mate in a short game).
- Opening variety: you score well in several sharp Sicilian lines and Caro‑Kann; your Strength Adjusted Win Rate (~0.504) shows you generally perform at or slightly above expectation versus similar opponents.
Main areas to improve
- Time management — many games end on time. Practice keeping a safe reserve and make faster practical decisions when needed.
- Decision-making in endgame/time-trouble: you sometimes keep complications when a simpler route would win cleanly under the clock.
- Opening consistency — high-volume lines like Modern and Czech have lower win rates; either tighten your knowledge there or replace one with a simpler line.
- Avoid trades that free opponent counterplay when you're low on time; maintain piece activity or simplify to an easy technical plan.
Concrete drills (30–60 minutes each)
- Tactics (15–25 min daily): mix puzzle‑rush style speed with 8–12 slow puzzles where you fully calculate before checking. Focus on forks, skewers, and promotion tactics.
- Endgame practice (2–3× week, 20–30 min): king+pawn vs king, basic rook endgames, queen vs pawn promotion races. Drill promotion timing and stalemate awareness.
- Blitz with clock-focus (daily, 20–30 min): play 5|0 or 3|2 and force yourself to maintain a 20–30s reserve. Practice choosing good practical moves under pressure.
- Post‑mortem routine (10–15 min per game): annotate the single turning point and extract one fixable habit (e.g., "simplify at move X", "avoid pre-move").)
Opening: quick adjustments
- Double down on lines that score well for you (Sicilian Moscow/Haag, some Anti‑Sveshnikov lines). Learn 2–3 typical plans and common tactical motifs so you get comfortable fast in blitz.
- For heavy-volume but lower-win lines (Modern, Czech): either prepare short, clear plans for the common replies or swap one line for a simpler-to-play option that reduces calculation needs during blitz.
- Create a 1‑page cheat sheet per opening: key move-order, one typical pawn break, best square(s) for knights, and one trap to avoid.
Practical clock tips (immediately actionable)
- Set a personal rule: if under 15 seconds, prioritize a safe, practical move over trying to find the objectively best continuation.
- Train with increment (3+2 or 5+3) to build habit of keeping a 20–30s buffer. If you play 5|0 or 3|0, stop deep calculation at ~10 seconds and move.
- Use pre-moves sparingly: only when captures/recaptures are safe; avoid pre-moves in pawn races and promotion situations.
- Adopt a "two-minute reserve" heuristic: in a 5-minute game, aim to keep ~1 minute total available for the endgame; in 3-minute games, keep ~30 seconds.
30‑day study plan
- Week 1: Daily tactics (25 min), 3 rapid 10+1 games with postgame notes, 3 short endgame drills (k+p, rook basics).
- Week 2: Build opening cheat sheets for two preferred lines; play 10 blitz focusing on those lines. Continue tactics 15 min/day.
- Week 3: Play 20 blitz games with strict clock rule (never drop below 10s deliberately). Annotate 8 decisive games (win/loss/time loss).
- Week 4: Simulate tournament conditions: two 15+10 games and a 3+2 session; analyze critical moments and reinforce time management habits.
Two immediate homework tasks
- Recreate the promotion race from your long win and play both sides vs an engine at a low depth in 5|0; practice avoiding stalemate and correctly timing promotions.
- Pick three moments from recent time-loss games and decide the single simplest plan you could have followed under time pressure (e.g., trade into a winning pawn ending, centralize king, keep rook on 7th).
Notes from recent games (quick pointers)
- Win vs Eric Cooke: excellent patience and promotion play — reinforce queen vs pawn endgame technique.
- Win vs chapion_gold: tactical finish with Qxf7 mate — continue hunting early back-rank weaknesses in similar opponents.
- Loss vs rajendrastha: lost on time. Positionally you had resources; the key fix is the clock rule and simpler decision-making under 20s.
- Losses vs daivari94 and torgeirgillebo: both ended on time; these underline that your technical play is solid but the clock is turning wins/draws into losses.
Metrics & trends — short interpretation
- Your long-term history shows high peak strength and a lot of volume — that experience is an advantage.
- Recent small declines (-18 over 1 and 3 months, -28 over 6 months) plus a negative 6‑month slope suggest some inconsistency or reduced focused practice; targeted drills should reverse that quickly.
- Large game volume is valuable: small, consistent habit changes (clock + endgame drills) will produce a noticeable rating effect.
Quick checklist before your next session
- Pick 2 openings for the session and stick to them for 10 games.
- Warm up: 10 minutes tactics + 10 minutes endgame practice.
- During the session: if clock < 15s, play a practical safe move in under 8s.
- End session: annotate 3 decisive games and list one actionable fix for the next session.
I can help with
- Create a 1‑page cheat sheet for two openings you pick (move orders + typical plans).
- Build a 2‑week tactical set tailored to motifs from your games and a clock-management drill routine.
- Analyze one specific loss move‑by‑move (paste link or tell me which game, e.g., the loss vs rajendrastha), and I’ll show where to simplify vs calculate.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| marikosinorita | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ilialika | 30W / 1L / 3D | View Games |
| nanucciii | 11W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| Vlastimil Píza | 8W / 5L / 3D | View Games |
| sanibani4 | 3W / 9L / 0D | View Games |
| mrihter | 4W / 6L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1057 | 2246 | 2331 | |
| 2024 | 1048 | 2253 | 2357 | |
| 2023 | 902 | 2133 | 2243 | 1200 |
| 2022 | 1022 | 2128 | 2202 | |
| 2021 | 2170 | 2202 | ||
| 2020 | 1007 | 2081 | 1938 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 71W / 68L / 21D | 53W / 91L / 20D | 85.4 |
| 2024 | 326W / 364L / 93D | 337W / 378L / 80D | 86.4 |
| 2023 | 300W / 364L / 79D | 260W / 394L / 82D | 83.6 |
| 2022 | 123W / 129L / 63D | 96W / 165L / 52D | 84.9 |
| 2021 | 204W / 204L / 58D | 204W / 216L / 48D | 83.6 |
| 2020 | 128W / 88L / 27D | 114W / 113L / 17D | 81.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 430 | 180 | 213 | 37 | 41.9% |
| Czech Defense | 291 | 113 | 153 | 25 | 38.8% |
| Modern Defense | 177 | 70 | 90 | 17 | 39.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 139 | 59 | 60 | 20 | 42.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 125 | 59 | 52 | 14 | 47.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 123 | 53 | 57 | 13 | 43.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 89 | 39 | 43 | 7 | 43.8% |
| Australian Defense | 87 | 37 | 44 | 6 | 42.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 83 | 42 | 38 | 3 | 50.6% |
| French Defense | 77 | 34 | 36 | 7 | 44.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 270 | 125 | 120 | 25 | 46.3% |
| Czech Defense | 170 | 64 | 80 | 26 | 37.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 72 | 30 | 31 | 11 | 41.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 70 | 37 | 29 | 4 | 52.9% |
| Modern Defense | 66 | 18 | 32 | 16 | 27.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 59 | 27 | 27 | 5 | 45.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 58 | 25 | 23 | 10 | 43.1% |
| French Defense | 57 | 14 | 30 | 13 | 24.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 55 | 25 | 21 | 9 | 45.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 45 | 18 | 22 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |