Pavel Salman - FIDE Master & Chess Adventure Enthusiast
Meet Pavel Salman, the FIDE Master with a flair for blitz battles and bullet firestorms. Known by some as CDOEspiao in the chessverse, Pavel's journey on the 64 squares reads like a thrilling saga of strategic brilliance and heart-pounding comebacks.
Rating Rollercoaster
Pavel's blitz rating skyrocketed from humble beginnings at 1358 in 2020, zooming up to a peak of 2625 in 2023— which is a bit like going from a friendly neighborhood grappler to a grandmaster-level dragon slayer in three short years. Bullet games are his playground too, boasting a top rating north of 2530 and an impressive win rate hovering above 55%.
Playing Style & Personality
With an endgame frequency of over 85%, Pavel enjoys the battlefield when the pieces start dropping. Every win averages a marathon of 80 moves, showing patience and persistence — unless it’s time for a quick tactical knockout, which Pavel excels at, evidenced by a shocking 100% win rate after losing a piece. Nervous? Not Pavel: a tilt factor of 7 means he stays (mostly) cool under pressure, even if rated games feel a bit tougher than casual ones.
Tactical Wizardry
This master’s not just about brains, but brawn: Pavel's comeback rate is a jaw-dropping 91.68%, proving he's the type to bounce back like a rubber rook after setbacks. And talk about grit – one-sided losses are so rare for him, they happen less than 1% of the time.
Chess Humor & Quirks
Pavel’s opponents should beware: his longest winning streak hit a fierce 14 games, so never underestimate this player’s ability to clean sweep the board. Despite an affinity for "Top Secret" openings, we suspect Pavel just likes keeping opponents guessing — because who doesn’t love a little mystery on the chessboard?
Favorite Opponent Stats
Over time, Pavel has tangled with some serious foes like el_ultimo_pablo and jlindner, earning a decent mix of wins and losses. However, against surprise challengers named leopato or bonantagulo, Pavel's win rate shines at a perfect 100%. The motto? Never let your guard down, especially not around “unknowns”!
Whether climbing the rankings or dropping a sneaky fork, Pavel Salman continues to charm chess lovers with a mix of dedication, cheeky tactics, and a passion that turns every game into an epic story.
Quick read on your recent bullet games
You’ve shown a strong willingness to fight for dynamic positions and to press when the opponent’s king is exposed. When you can keep the momentum, your attacking sense shines through and you convert favorable moments into clean wins. In tougher moments, especially under time pressure, the clarity of plan starts to blur and the position becomes easy to misunderstand.
What you’re doing well
- Your instinct to create active play and look for forcing moves is solid. In fast games, you often find tasks that push your opponent to react rather than dictate the pace yourself.
- You have demonstrated strong endgame persistence in some wins, keeping pressure on the opponent long enough to convert advantages into a victory.
- You show comfort with flexible opening ideas (favoring solid development and quick piece activation), which helps you reach playable middlegame positions quickly.
Key improvement areas
- Time management in bullet games: In the loss game, you were squeezed on the clock and that pressure likely led to missed defensive resources and imprecise decisions. Build a simple time plan for each stage of the game and practice sticking to it, even when you see a tactical shot you want to chase.
- Stick to a clear middlegame plan: In some sequences the plan shifts too often, making it hard to evaluate trades and piece activity. Try to identify a basic, repeatable plan for your preferred openings (for example, Colle-like structures: solid development, central control, and a consistent idea to open lines) and follow it unless a concrete tactical opportunity demands a deviation.
- Pattern recognition and defense: Bullet games rely on quick recognition of tactics. Strengthen this by solving a steady stream of tactical puzzles focused on common motifs (forks, pins, skewers, and mating nets) and review missed ideas after each session to prevent repeats.
- Endgame conversion: When you gain material, practice methodical conversion rather than rushing into exchanges. Work on simple endgames (rook endings, king and pawn endings) so you can convert advantages cleanly even when you’re short on time.
Openings patterns and how to use them
Your openings show comfort with solid, flexible structures that lead to active middlegames. Focus on reinforcing the following ideas during the next phase of study:
- Colle System / Rhamphorhynchus Variation: Keep developing with a safe, solid setup and look for the central break at the right moment that opens lines for your pieces.
- King’s Indian Attack: Maintain a flexible pawn structure and prepare a coordinated kingside push when the position supports it; practice recognizing when to strike or slow down based on your opponent’s setup.
- Amar Gambit and other sharp lines: Be sure you have a clear plan for common responses so you don’t get overwhelmed by early drama; decide in advance whether you want to accept the gambit or steer toward a more controlled game.
Training plan and practical steps
- Two-week focus: Pick 2 openings you enjoy (for example Colle and King’s Indian Attack). Do 2 targeted drills per week: one opening-specific study (concepts, typical pawn structures, and typical plans) and one tactical puzzle set that reinforces motifs common in those lines.
- Endgame drills: Spend 15–20 minutes 3 times a week working on simple endgames (rooks and pawns vs rooks, king activity in a pawn ending, basic rook endings) to improve conversion under time pressure.
- Time awareness: Practice with a timer to simulate bullet pace. Start with a 2+1 or 3+2 format and gradually reduce the time per move as you gain comfort, while keeping accuracy reasonable.
Next steps and micro-goals
- Goal 1 (2 weeks): Build a stable opening plan for your two main choices and reach middlegame with a clear, simple plan in at least 4 of 6 sessions.
- Goal 2 (2–4 weeks): Complete a consistent tactical puzzle routine (5–10 minutes per day) focused on motifs seen in your games, with a review of any missed ideas.
- Goal 3 (1 month): Improve time management by ensuring you have at least a couple of minutes left around move 25 in bullet games, reducing the frequency of flag losses.
Profile quick link
See your profile for a quick reference: pavelsalman
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Samuel Malka | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| barsoi85 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Ness Stilla | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| David | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| oganromchess | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| amir_mm | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| manafraidofhorses | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| madmaxpayne26 | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| chessforsharks | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| deepmind13 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| el_ultimo_pablo | 5W / 9L / 4D | |
| Jean Lindner | 7W / 6L / 2D | |
| harald_blatand | 6W / 4L / 2D | |
| Warrick Rolfe | 8W / 3L / 0D | |
| milostb | 4W / 4L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2594 | |||
| 2024 | 2585 | |||
| 2023 | 2439 | 2559 | 1200 | |
| 2022 | 2463 | 2450 | ||
| 2020 | 2292 | 1475 | ||
| 2019 | 2281 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 64W / 47L / 14D | 63W / 55L / 10D | 86.5 |
| 2024 | 11W / 13L / 2D | 14W / 14L / 2D | 90.7 |
| 2023 | 447W / 364L / 72D | 414W / 381L / 94D | 85.7 |
| 2022 | 314W / 205L / 41D | 259W / 244L / 54D | 86.9 |
| 2020 | 28W / 17L / 5D | 17W / 27L / 9D | 92.5 |
| 2019 | 34W / 9L / 1D | 31W / 12L / 4D | 81.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 529 | 270 | 214 | 45 | 51.0% |
| Czech Defense | 154 | 76 | 63 | 15 | 49.4% |
| Modern | 149 | 70 | 67 | 12 | 47.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 143 | 68 | 63 | 12 | 47.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 122 | 72 | 40 | 10 | 59.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 113 | 56 | 44 | 13 | 49.6% |
| King's Indian Attack | 112 | 61 | 45 | 6 | 54.5% |
| Benko Gambit | 104 | 51 | 43 | 10 | 49.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 90 | 49 | 32 | 9 | 54.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 89 | 43 | 42 | 4 | 48.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 33 | 20 | 11 | 2 | 60.6% |
| King's Indian Attack | 18 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 61.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 58.8% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 15 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 64.3% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 40.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 7 | 1 |