L M S T De Silva - International Master & Chess Connoisseur
Meet L M S T De Silva, the player who doesn’t just play chess—they redefine it, one blitz game at a time. Awarded the esteemed title of International Master by FIDE, De Silva is a force to reckon with on the 64 squares. Their blitz rating has soared as high as 2807, which is pretty much chess wizardry, while bullet and rapid formats have bowed under their strategic spells.
With a blitz win count ticking well past 540 victories and a bullet win rate flirting with a dazzling 60%, De Silva prefers to keep their opponents guessing. They’ve even racked up an astonishing 14-game winning streak at one point—because who likes to lose twice in a row?
De Silva’s games aren’t just battles; they’re theatrical comebacks. Losing a piece? No problem! Their 100% win rate after losing material suggests that dropping a piece is just part of their grand plan. And when it comes to endgames, they’re hanging out long enough to squeeze out every quantum of advantage, with an average game length exceeding 70 moves.
When not busy demolishing opponents, they keep a healthy psychological edge with a low tilt factor of 7—because throwing the board is so last century. Interestingly, they do better under the moonlight or in the wee hours: their top win rate hours are around 2 AM and 10 PM, perfect for night owls and late-night masterminds.
Those facing De Silva often wish they had a time machine—losing to this master is as inevitable as pawns advancing on the second rank. And if you’re lucky enough to face them on a Saturday, be warned: they win over 60% of their games that day, statistically making it the most precarious day to cross swords.
Known online as Chess23Wizzard (because why not?), De Silva blends top-secret opening tactics with lightning-fast calculation—no surprise given they’ve logged over 1,000 blitz games with a consistent 50%+ win rate. Whether it’s bullet, blitz, or rapid, this player’s passion for chess and relentless pursuit of excellence make them a legend in the making.
Pro tip: If you ever bump into De Silva at the chessboard, bring your best moves... and maybe a coffee for those long endgames.
Overview of your rapid games
You have demonstrated a strong upward trajectory in rapid play, with a healthy winning pace and positive progress across time. You show confidence in a flexible opening repertoire and a readiness to calculate and act on tactical opportunities when they arise.
What you’re doing well
- You engage actively in tactics and are comfortable creating concrete threats when you have the initiative. This willingness to calculate forcing lines often leads to favorable positions and clean finishes.
- Your opening variety is a notable strength. You’re comfortable trying different setups, which keeps opponents guessing and helps you practice a wide range of middlegame plans.
- In several games you convert advantages effectively, showing good piece activity and a knack for coordinating pieces toward clear goals.
Areas to improve
- Time management: In some middlegames you spent extra time thinking deeply. Build in a simple time budget for the opening and early middlegame to avoid late-session pressure and ensure you have time for the critical decisions later on.
- Opening depth and consistency: Although your openings are varied, many show only a single-game data point. Select 2–3 openings you enjoy and study their typical middlegame plans and common responses to typical defenses so you can play them with more confidence against a wider pool of opponents.
- Endgame technique: Strengthen your practical endgames (rook endings, minor-piece endings, and pawn endings) so you can convert more half-points when material or positional parity occurs.
- Pattern recognition: Continue building a library of recurring tactical motifs (pins, skewers, forks, and discovered attacks) and practice recognizing them quickly in real games.
Opening performance snapshot
Your opening performance shows strong results across several lines, indicating good adaptability and understanding of typical middlegame plans for those structures. The one line that didn’t yield a win is a particularly sharp, double-edged defense; if you want to continue with it, plan targeted study of its main ideas, key pawn structures, and common tactical resources. Otherwise, you can prioritize lines you’re most comfortable with and deepen those to reinforce consistent results.
- Strength: Diverse openings played with confidence, often leading to favorable middlegames.
- Focus area: Deepen a couple of favorite lines to improve recall and plan execution under time pressure.
Practice plan and next steps
- Choose 2–3 openings to master deeply this month. Study typical middlegame plans, common pawn structures, and representative sample games.
- Incorporate 20 tactical puzzles per week, focusing on forks, pins, discovered attacks, and endgame motifs.
- Review one recent game per session with three concrete takeaways for improvement, and apply these in your next games.
- Work on time management drills: in standard rapid practice, set a cap for early moves and ensure you reserve time for critical midgame decisions.
- Regular endgame practice: practice rook endings and simplified positions to improve conversion when the game simplifies.
Suggested practice starter
To begin applying this feedback, you can try a focused training session like this: review a recent win in your chosen openings, solve 5 tactical puzzles centered on the planned middlegame themes, and then play a 15-move drill game focusing on sticking to your chosen plan and not overextending.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3dsquelton420 | 22W / 18L / 3D | View Games |
| Khatanbaatar Bazar | 6W / 4L / 2D | View Games |
| Savitha Shri B | 11W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| Dhanush Bharadwaj | 6W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
| Marcus Harvey | 4W / 3L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2644 | |||
| 2024 | 2526 | 2662 | ||
| 2023 | 2526 | 2687 | ||
| 2022 | 2457 | 2697 | 2354 | |
| 2021 | 2592 | 2617 | 1743 | |
| 2020 | 2282 | 2570 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8W / 6L / 1D | 5W / 5L / 3D | 74.7 |
| 2024 | 66W / 57L / 12D | 64W / 62L / 9D | 75.4 |
| 2023 | 61W / 42L / 8D | 60W / 44L / 10D | 78.9 |
| 2022 | 47W / 45L / 4D | 41W / 43L / 9D | 80.9 |
| 2021 | 103W / 66L / 10D | 94W / 73L / 14D | 79.0 |
| 2020 | 84W / 40L / 15D | 74W / 55L / 8D | 72.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 61 | 33 | 24 | 4 | 54.1% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 32 | 19 | 11 | 2 | 59.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 25 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 56.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 23 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 56.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 23 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 60.9% |
| Modern | 23 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 43.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 22 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 59.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 22 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 20 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 20 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 55.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 21 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Australian Defense | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| Döry Defense | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Neo-Gruenfeld Defense, with 5. Nf3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Belyavsky Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 3 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |