Profile Summary: Patrick Gong (aka Ekko_li)
Meet Patrick Gong, an International Master (IM) whose chess journey is as fascinating as the games he plays. Known online as Ekko_li, Patrick has battled knights, queens, and time controls across multiple years, steadily climbing the ranks with a blend of grit and finesse. His reputation on the digital battlefield is legendary, with a blitz peak rating soaring as high as 2823 in 2024 — a number that many grandmasters only dream of!
From Humble Beginnings to International Master
Patrick's chess tale started modestly in 2013 with daily games rating around 1300. However, like a well-executed fork, his skill quickly gained ground. By 2019, his daily chess rating nearly hit 1955, and his blitz prowess was already shaking the online chess world. With relentless practice, tactical sharpness, and a knack for endgame wizardry, he earned the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE, proudly representing the class of dedicated masters.
Playing Style & Chess Personality
Never one to resign prematurely, Patrick’s early resignation rate is a mere 1.57%, showing his fighting spirit brimming like a pawn ready to promote. His games tend to be marathon battles, averaging about 75 moves per win, hinting at both patience and precise calculation. He's especially dangerous at night — his best time to strike on the chessboard is around 9 PM, proving that sometimes the darkest hours produce the brightest ideas.
Patrick’s games are known for a high frequency of endgames (76.78%), where he demonstrates exceptional skill to outmaneuver opponents who dare to enter the late stages. His renowned comeback rate of 87.26% speaks volumes: even after losing a piece, he can turn the tables like a magician pulling winning tricks out of thin air. Tilt is real, but with a factor of 13, Patrick stays remarkably composed under pressure — enough to make even Magnus Carlsen nod in approval.
Online Warrior & Opener Extraordinaire
Online, Patrick is a blitz beast famous for consistent battling in the “Top Secret” openings – a mysterious playbook that has netted him almost 4,100 wins out of over 8,300 blitz games! His win rates in rapid and bullet formats also reflect his flexible adaptability, conquering opponents across every time control. His habit of winning by timeout or resignation suggests an intense pressure game that grinds foes down either on the clock or on the board.
Fun Fact:
Patrick’s longest winning streak spans an impressive 16 games, a feat that would make chess engines question their existence. He’s also faced some of the same opponents repeatedly, turning friendly rivalries into epic sagas – including a notable 168 battles against ho_jei. The results? Let’s just say Patrick has more tricks up his sleeve than a magician at a chess convention.
Recent Highlights
In November 2024, Patrick notched a stunning victory in a live chess blitz game with a clever handling of the Alapin Sicilian Defense, showing his mastery in both strategy and clock management by winning on time against a 2550-rated opponent. That’s not just a win — it’s a statement.
In Summary
Patrick Gong is a chess player who embodies determination, strategic depth, and a passion for the game that’s truly infectious. Whether grinding out grueling endgames or blitzing through complex middlegames, his blend of high-level skill and unyielding spirit makes him a formidable figure in the chess world.
Keep your kings protected and your queens close—Patrick’s coming for them!
Hi Patrick!
You’ve put together an impressive body of rapid-play games lately. Below is a concise review of recurring patterns I saw in your most recent results, along with targeted suggestions you can apply right away.
What’s already working
- Opening breadth: You’re comfortable with both 1.e4 and 1.d4 structures, and you frequently steer the game into less-theoretical sidelines where opponents must think on their own.
- Dynamic pawn play: Many of your wins arise from well-timed pawn breaks such as …c6 / …d5 in the Pirc or early queenside pushes with b4–b5. This willingness to grab space is a major practical weapon.
- Tactical alertness in reduced material: In the win vs. NormWeinstein you converted an equal rook-and-knight ending by spotting a tactic (41.Rc6! 42.Rxa6) that converted a small edge into a winning passer.
Main areas to tighten
-
Loose king safety in the early middlegame
In several losses (e.g. vs. MITerryble and Harsha_Bharathakoti) you castled, then drifted into piece manoeuvres without asking “What is my opponent’s blunt plan against my king?” Moves like 14…Be6 and 19…c6 left dark-square holes that White exploited.
Action drill: After your 8th–10th move, freeze for two seconds and verbalise: “Where are the pawn storms? Which colour-complex is weak?” This mental speed-bump will catch 80 % of these oversights. -
Over-extension of minor pieces
Games vs. alexrustemov and GaryOldmaninYaFace featured early knight hops to e5 / g4 / b4 without enough backup, leading to tempo-gaining pawn kicks.
Rule of thumb: If the piece can be chased by one pawn, make sure you gain a concrete concession. Otherwise, keep it on a flexible square. -
Time-management plateau
Nearly every defeat shows you under 20 seconds by move 35 while the opponent still has 40-60 s. You’re playing “classical” calculations in a 3-minute framework.
Try the 10-20-70 clock split:- First 10 moves: spend ≤ 40 % of your clock.
- Next 10 moves: ≤ 30 %.
- Final 20 moves: keep ≥ 30 % in reserve for bullet-mode conversion.
Opening snapshot
You’ve scored well with the Alapin (c3 Sicilian) and Modern/Pirc setups. Your toughest outings came from French Rubinstein and Old Benoni lines where you accepted passive structures too quickly. One quick repertoire tweak:
- With White vs. French: Consider the Tarrasch line 3.Nd2 c5 4.exd5 exd5 5.Nf3. Fewer forcing tactics, easier to blitz out.
- With Black vs. d4 c4: Replace the immediate …c5 Old Benoni with a flexible …e6/…d6 Benko-move-order; you’ll avoid early Nb5 ideas that hurt you vs. Harsha.
Endgame focus
Positive: your rook-ending technique is steadily improving.
Next step: invest 15 minutes/day on rook + two pawns vs. rook studies—exactly the sort of positions where you flag or win on time.
Stats & tracking
• Peak blitz rating: 2823 (2024-11-05)
• Hour-by-hour performance:
• Day-of-week swing:
Short homework plan (7 days)
- Day 1-2: Review all losses with the Chess.com computer, but only first 15 moves. Note recurring tactical threats missed.
- Day 3-4: Drill 50 puzzles rated 2600-2800 on “advanced” themes (skewers, deflections). Time cap = 45 s/puzzle.
- Day 5: Play a 15 | 10 game and annotate it fully. Focus on move-explanations, not engine lines.
- Day 6-7: Re-visit two critical endings from this week and set them up against the engine—play each side twice.
Keep the momentum!
You’re hovering at a rating ceiling that requires tightening move-to-move discipline rather than adding new flashy ideas. Implement the simple time-management hack and review king-safety checkpoints—your conversion rate vs. 2600-plus opponents should climb quickly.
See you over the board,
Your Chess Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| roadtowc2025 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| squid_stomper | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Alvaro Torres Rebolledo | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Paul Szuper | 3W / 5L / 2D | View |
| BSWPaulsen | 4W / 3L / 1D | View |
| megamansss | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mart500 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| stolencandy13 | 5W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sml60 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| giorbinky | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ho_jei | 76W / 73L / 19D | View Games |
| kousel | 35W / 5L / 3D | View Games |
| twofoxniel | 10W / 12L / 1D | View Games |
| Jack Rodgers | 12W / 7L / 3D | View Games |
| Sanjeev Mishra | 9W / 8L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2771 | 1906 | ||
| 2024 | 2800 | |||
| 2023 | 2699 | 2276 | 1906 | |
| 2022 | 2147 | 2276 | 1906 | |
| 2021 | 2429 | 2474 | 2276 | |
| 2020 | 2306 | 2448 | 2511 | 1906 |
| 2019 | 2403 | 2470 | 1906 | |
| 2018 | 2253 | 2490 | 1270 | |
| 2017 | 2076 | 2395 | ||
| 2016 | 1737 | 2154 | 1270 | |
| 2015 | 1758 | 2107 | 1473 | 1292 |
| 2014 | 1728 | 2031 | 1327 | |
| 2013 | 1185 | 1806 | 1265 | |
| 2012 | 1138 | 1363 | 1118 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10W / 8L / 1D | 7W / 8L / 3D | 89.4 |
| 2024 | 112W / 70L / 12D | 99W / 83L / 9D | 85.6 |
| 2023 | 4W / 2L / 0D | 4W / 1L / 2D | 86.7 |
| 2022 | 146W / 108L / 19D | 153W / 98L / 16D | 81.6 |
| 2021 | 165W / 109L / 26D | 140W / 126L / 22D | 81.1 |
| 2020 | 447W / 383L / 73D | 427W / 400L / 68D | 80.0 |
| 2019 | 144W / 97L / 14D | 123W / 112L / 19D | 77.0 |
| 2018 | 19W / 18L / 5D | 24W / 17L / 5D | 79.0 |
| 2017 | 76W / 35L / 9D | 61W / 47L / 7D | 86.0 |
| 2016 | 15W / 17L / 1D | 22W / 14L / 2D | 63.3 |
| 2015 | 352W / 263L / 62D | 319W / 282L / 62D | 76.4 |
| 2014 | 467W / 351L / 71D | 405W / 393L / 76D | 73.8 |
| 2013 | 239W / 227L / 48D | 195W / 270L / 35D | 72.7 |
| 2012 | 58W / 102L / 8D | 67W / 91L / 9D | 77.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 18 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 61.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 695 | 363 | 274 | 58 | 52.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 649 | 314 | 285 | 50 | 48.4% |
| Czech Defense | 403 | 191 | 184 | 28 | 47.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 261 | 134 | 109 | 18 | 51.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 189 | 93 | 85 | 11 | 49.2% |
| Scotch Game | 177 | 94 | 70 | 13 | 53.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 177 | 84 | 76 | 17 | 47.5% |
| Modern | 160 | 79 | 73 | 8 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 126 | 58 | 55 | 13 | 46.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 126 | 67 | 45 | 14 | 53.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Czech Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Neo-Gruenfeld: 4.Bg2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 18 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 64.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Center Game | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 4 |