Overview
Maksim Ermakov (komikaoxid) is a spirited National Master who made his name online as a blitz specialist. Quick on the clock and fond of quirky opening duels, Maksim blends long, technical endgames with sudden tactical fireworks — often leaving opponents convinced they were attacked by a particularly well-read raccoon.
- Title: National Master (National)
- Preferred time control: Blitz (specialist)
- Peak blitz performance:
- Career trend snapshot:
Playing style & strengths
Maksim is deceptively patient for a blitz player — his games tend to be long and rich. He grinds in endgames, has a very high comeback rate, and is comfortable sacrificing for dynamic chances.
- Endgame frequency: ~78% of games go into endgame territory
- Average moves per decisive game: ~80 moves (wins and losses both hover around 80)
- Comeback rate: ~81% — knows how to make a fight of it
- Win-after-losing-piece: ~46% — resilient and tactically alert
- Early resignation rate: low (~4.36%) — rarely gives up without a fight
Favorite openings (blitz)
Maksim favors systems that lead to rich middlegame plans and practical imbalances. He plays a lot of London System lines as well as several Sicilian and Colle setups.
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — 212 games, win rate ~60% (London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation)
- Australian Defense — 89 games, win rate ~58% (Australian Defense)
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin & Sherzer variations — popular choice when he wants sharp asymmetry (Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation)
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — used as a practical weapon in blitz (Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation)
Career highlights & streaks
- Earned the National Master title and established himself as a top blitz specialist.
- Longest winning streak: 15 games — a period that left chat moderators reaching for superlatives.
- Longest losing streak: 10 games — even the best have their “what-even-is-a-pawn” days.
- Extensive online experience: thousands of decisive games across blitz, bullet and rapid formats.
Opponents & notable records
Maksim has a set of frequent rivals and some surprising matchups. If you want a quick rematch, try catching him at his usual hours (see below).
- Most-played: Tikhon Popov — 65 games (record vs him: 21–35–9)
- Other frequent opponents: Ya_Coco_Jamboo (34 games), Nigel Short (12 games), Vladimir Hamitevici (12 games)
- Notable clean-sheet record: "cute_wolfy" — 11 wins, 0 losses
When to challenge Maksim
Want the best chance of catching Maksim in top form? He tends to do well on weekends and late evenings.
- Best day: Saturday (win rate ~54.6%)
- Best hour: around 21:00 (BestTimeOfDayToPlay: 21:00; hour 21 shows a strong win rate)
- High-performing hours: 5:00–6:00 and mid-afternoon windows also show solid numbers
Sample game
A short illustrative opening that shows Maksim’s comfort with classical development and quick kingside play:
Fun facts & miscellany
- Nickname online: komikaoxid — expect dry humor and occasional chess puns in chat.
- Remarkably resilient: strong “win after down material” numbers and a habit of turning seemingly dead positions into long defensive struggles.
- Preparation: median prep depth around 3–4 moves in recent years — practical and pragmatic rather than bookish.
Want to explore more
Check out his progress over time and sample games embedded above. For opponent pages and opening terms, use the in-line links (they open internal profiles/definitions).
- View a timeline:
- Look up an opponent: Tikhon Popov
- Study a favored opening: London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation
Quick overview
Nice block of games — you’re creating chances, converting complicated endgames and still showing a healthy win rate against strong opposition. Recent rating trends show small gains over 1–3 months and a positive strength-adjusted win rate (~52%), so your practical play is working. Below are concrete takeaways from your most recent win and most recent loss plus a short training plan.
Win — highlights (vs nataikuai)
Key strengths shown in the win:
- You play actively: rooks and queen penetrated the enemy position, creating perpetual threats and forcing concessions.
- Good use of passed pawns and king activity in the long endgame — you turned activity into concrete threats and kept the opponent short on time.
- When tension rose you chose simplifying trades that increased your practical chances (exchanging into a favorable queen + pawn/rook ending).
Concrete moments to remember:
- Advance the kingside pawns to open lines (the g- and f-pawn play) and then use rooks on the open files — this paid off.
- A sequence of checks and queen maneuvers kept the opponent tied down and eventually won on time — good practical play under blitz clock pressure.
Replay the game (key moments):
Loss — what went wrong (vs Bartlomiej Heberla)
The decisive game ended with a mating net. The loss highlights a few recurring issues worth fixing:
- Tactical oversights near move 41–43: after Rxa2 you allowed White a decisive infiltration (Qxd5+ and Rf8#). Watch for back-rank and mating patterns when your queen/major pieces are off the back rank.
- Pawn pushes and structure: early pawn advances on the queenside left holes and gave White targets (the a-file invasion and subsequent tactics).
- Timing of exchanges: several exchanges opened lines to your king — be cautious when simplifying if the opponent gets open files toward your monarch.
Replay the decisive sequence:
Recurring patterns I see
- Strengths: You create imbalances and are comfortable converting in long queen/rook endgames. Good at translating activity into practical chances (flag wins or time-pressure wins).
- Weaknesses: Occasional tactical lapses when under time pressure and sometimes lax king safety after pawn advances on the flank.
- Opening profile: Your best results are in the London Poisoned Pawn and Australian Defense lines — lean into the ideas there rather than memorizing move orders. Your Alapin/Sicilian results suggest mixed handling of dynamic pawn-structure positions.
Concrete training plan (4-week cycle)
Focus on high-impact, time-efficient work for blitz improvement.
- Daily (20–30 min): Tactics — 200 problems/week, emphasize pattern recognition for pins, skewers, back-rank mates and queen forks. Time each set to simulate blitz pressure.
- 3×/week (30–45 min): Rapidly review 2–3 opening lines you play most (London Poisoned Pawn, Australian Defense). Learn the typical middlegame plans and pawn breaks — aim for plans, not move memorization.
- 2×/week (20 min): Short endgame drills — basic rook + pawn vs rook, king + pawn endgames and queen vs rook basics. You convert activity into wins often — make it reliable in low time.
- Weekly (post-session): Review 3 lost games (including the loss vs Bartlomiej Heberla). Identify the single tactical miss and one strategic error per game; add a one-line note to fix it.
- Blitz-specific habit: in the last 10 seconds avoid speculative moves — ask yourself: “Is my king safe? Am I hanging material? Any direct mate?”
Practical checklist — apply every game
- Before each move: check for checks, captures and threats (3-second scan).
- Avoid speeding when your opponent has active heavy pieces — spend a few extra seconds securing the back rank and escape squares.
- When simplifying into an endgame, evaluate piece activity and pawn structure first — don’t trade into a passive king position.
Next steps & quick drills
- Drill 1: 10 back-rank puzzles under a 5–6 second average per puzzle (improves awareness vs mates like the one you suffered).
- Drill 2: Play 8 rapid games (10+3) focusing only on two openings — don’t change the repertoire during the set.
- Post-game: save one loss and one win and annotate three moments: best move, mistake, alternative plan.
- Want me to annotate the loss vs Bartlomiej Heberla move-by-move? I can create a short annotated replay of the critical sequence.
Motivation & closing
Your rating history shows sustained elite-level play and the ability to bounce back. Small targeted work on tactics, back-rank awareness and opening plans will convert many of those close losses into wins. Keep the training focused and measurable — a few minutes a day adds up quickly.
If you want, I can:
- Annotate the two full games move-by-move with alternative plans.
- Build a 2-week tactics set tailored to the patterns that cost you (back-rank, forks, discovered checks).
- Produce a short opening cheat-sheet for your top three lines (London Poisoned Pawn, Australian Defense, Alapin).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daniil Dubov | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Iwo Godzwon | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Giannis Kalogeris | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| marcoriehle | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Andrei Macovei | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Bartlomiej Heberla | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Lion-993 | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| nataikuai | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Volodya Torosyan | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| szabadaba | 5W / 4L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tikhon Popov | 21W / 35L / 9D | View Games |
| Ya_Coco_Jamboo | 14W / 15L / 5D | View Games |
| Aman Hambleton | 5W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
| Nigel Short | 7W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| Vladimir Hamitevici | 6W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2602 | 2806 | 2383 | |
| 2024 | 2501 | 2719 | ||
| 2023 | 2460 | 2646 | 2356 | |
| 2022 | 2031 | 2532 | ||
| 2021 | 2400 | 2385 | 1989 | |
| 2020 | 2246 | 2356 | 1799 | |
| 2019 | 2079 | 2128 | ||
| 2018 | 1683 | 2033 | 1506 | |
| 2017 | 1134 | 1451 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 153W / 158L / 36D | 128W / 177L / 30D | 95.4 |
| 2024 | 122W / 135L / 34D | 112W / 153L / 26D | 89.2 |
| 2023 | 216W / 206L / 45D | 194W / 235L / 35D | 87.2 |
| 2022 | 89W / 90L / 18D | 99W / 91L / 18D | 87.9 |
| 2021 | 25W / 25L / 2D | 26W / 20L / 5D | 78.9 |
| 2020 | 56W / 28L / 2D | 47W / 35L / 6D | 81.5 |
| 2019 | 99W / 50L / 10D | 86W / 68L / 5D | 71.8 |
| 2018 | 295W / 173L / 28D | 259W / 192L / 27D | 68.1 |
| 2017 | 29W / 8L / 2D | 18W / 16L / 4D | 66.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 212 | 128 | 72 | 12 | 60.4% |
| Döry Defense | 141 | 70 | 56 | 15 | 49.6% |
| Unknown | 122 | 60 | 62 | 0 | 49.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 111 | 51 | 52 | 8 | 46.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 103 | 46 | 52 | 5 | 44.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 103 | 50 | 44 | 9 | 48.5% |
| Australian Defense | 89 | 52 | 34 | 3 | 58.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 85 | 29 | 48 | 8 | 34.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 83 | 41 | 38 | 4 | 49.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 82 | 32 | 41 | 9 | 39.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 25 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 88.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 24 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 79.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 68.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 69.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Colle: 3...Bf5, Alekhine Variation | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| East Indian Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 16.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle: 3...Bf5, Alekhine Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 4 |