penyulambat: The International Master on a Blitz and Bullet Blitzkrieg
Known to the chess world by the enigmatic handle penyulambat, this International Master has been smashing pieces and expectations across the blitz and bullet boards since 2021.
With a blitz rating that soared as high as 2779 in 2024 and a bullet peak touching an almost mythical 2805 in 2025, penyulambat blends rapid-fire tactics with the strategic patience of a grandmaster’s endgame play. Averages north of 2700 in blitz and close to 2780 in bullet confirm this player’s consistent dominance and deep chess intellect, even when the clock is mercilessly ticking down.
What sets penyulambat apart? Apart from the title, this player boasts an impressive win rate of roughly 56% using the "Top Secret" opening in both blitz and bullet formats – the name alone suggests a penchant for mystery and deception on the board! Behind those moves lies a tactical genius with a 91% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece. In other words, if you manage to snag one of penyulambat's knights or bishops, congratulations — the game is far from over.
The psychological resiliency is notable too: with an early resignation rate below 0.5%, penyulambat fights through every position, proving that quitting is simply not in the repertoire. And true to a warrior’s spirit, the longest winning streak so far is a fierce 8 games, with a steady current streak reminding foes that it’s never safe to breathe easy.
Off the board, penyulambat’s game rhythm peaks at strangely specific hours like 3 AM and 15 PM with win rates hitting 70% and above — clearly, inspiration strikes at odd hours. And days of the week? Monday is where this master reigns supreme, cruising close to a 64% winning percentage.
Though the username paints a picture of a slowpoke ("penyulambat" means "slow" in Malay/Indonesian), this player’s games scream anything but: lightning-fast bullet duels and blitz wars won by a combination of tactical brilliance and psychological endurance.
Opponents beware: with a quirky mix of fierce tenacity, a sly opening repertoire, and all-night grinding streaks, penyulambat proves that sometimes, the slowest thinker strikes fastest.
Quick summary
Nice, penyulambat — your recent play shows the hallmarks of a strong, aggressive bullet player: fast, tactical, and willing to sacrifice for the initiative. Your opening choices produce lively positions and you convert concrete chances well. The things to tighten up are back‑rank awareness, follow‑through after speculative sacrifices, and a couple of time‑management habits that cost you losses or mates.
Win: highlights & what you did well
Game vs Richard Leyva Proenza — Pirc-ish structure (Pirc Defense)
- Good use of piece activity: you put pieces on aggressive squares (Bh6, Ng5) and created threats that forced your opponent to create weaknesses.
- You converted a material/positional advantage steadily: when the king stayed in the center and then on the queenside, you opened files and used rooks and queen actively to finish the game.
- Pawn play was practical: c3 and axb3 opened lines at the right moment and your passed pawn on the e‑file helped finish the game.
- Timing: in a 60s game you kept a usable clock and didn’t panic — good for bullet endurance.
Replay the final phase (quick viewer):
Loss: what to fix (concrete)
Game vs Vesna Bogdanovic — early sacrifice and sudden back‑rank mate
- Back‑rank vulnerability: after castling you allowed Rf8 and later Rxf1 mate. In bullet, always check for back‑rank checks before making capture or pawn pushes that leave the king with no luft.
- Follow‑up after speculative sacrifices: Bxf7+ and then knight jumps created chaos, but you didn’t create a sustainable mating net. When you give up material or tempo for attack, ensure a concrete continuation or escape routes for your pieces.
- Watch for simple tactical finishes from the opponent: Rxf1# is a one‑move tactic once your back rank is weak. Make creating luft (h3 or g3 or a rook retreat) a habit when the opponent has heavy pieces lined up.
Replay the decisive sequence:
Patterns and habits I see
- Strengths: strong opening preparation in your favorite lines (Amazon Attack, Four Knights), fast tactical calculation, and confidence in simplifying into winning endgames.
- Recurring leak: back‑rank and first‑rank mates / undefended back squares after castling kingside without luft or rook cover.
- Risk profile: you’re willing to sacrifice for initiative — that often works, but sometimes you accept the risk without verifying the continuation (especially in bullet).
- Time handling: generally okay, but there are moments of "single‑move focus" where you miss easy defensive resources in 1–3 second windows. That’s typical in 60s games — small habits can fix it.
Short, actionable training plan (for bullet)
- Back‑rank checklist (practice until automatic): before every move ask: “Does opponent have a back‑rank check or infiltration on f1/f2/e1?” If yes, fix it (luft with h3/g3, rook to e1/f1, or queen trade).
- 3‑minute tactical drills daily: focus on 1–3 move tactics (mates, forks, pins). 10–15 minutes keeps pattern recognition razor sharp for bullet.
- Practice safe pre‑moves: only pre‑move captures when your opponent cannot check or skewer you. In 60s, bad pre‑moves lose material quickly.
- Review fast losses: once a day, take 5 minutes to replay one loss and mark the single moment you missed the tactic — turn that into the back‑rank checklist.
- Opening tuning: keep your sharp lines (Amazon Attack etc.) but add one prophylactic move to your castle routine (a quick h3 or rook lift) when the opponent still has heavy pieces on the board.
Bullet checklist (before you hit the clock)
- Count attackers to your back rank — if two or more heavy pieces can invade, create luft.
- If you’re sacrificing, verify there is at least one forced continuation (tactic, mate, or winning material) — don’t rely on intuition alone in bullet.
- Keep one rook ready to defend the back rank after castling.
- Use pre‑moves only when there’s no check/skewer possible on the destination square.
Closing — next steps
You’re playing at a very high level for bullet and your Win/Loss record and opening results show that clearly. The small changes above (back‑rank habit, focused tactical drills, safe pre‑move rules) should net fast practical improvement and reduce avoidable losses. If you want, I can:
- prepare a 7‑day micro‑training plan tailored to your openings
- generate 50 custom back‑rank tactics as a drill set
- annotate one of your loss games move‑by‑move with alternative lines
Which of those would you like next?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vesna Bogdanovic | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Bhavik Ahuja | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| gatodeayala | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Jerzy Slaby | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Richard Leyva Proenza | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| abdulbaghiyev_03 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Martha Fierro | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| chill_out112 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Radoslav Genov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| josevalencia06030 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gryffindor92 | 19W / 5L / 1D | View Games |
| Rogelio Barcenilla | 6W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| ali shahibzadegan | 3W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| Eric Kurtz | 3W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| Danielian Elina | 4W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2731 | 2737 | ||
| 2024 | 2790 | 2647 | ||
| 2023 | 2680 | |||
| 2022 | 2786 | 2629 | ||
| 2021 | 2400 | 2726 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20W / 17L / 2D | 18W / 13L / 5D | 94.9 |
| 2024 | 31W / 27L / 5D | 32W / 27L / 5D | 100.9 |
| 2023 | 14W / 7L / 2D | 13W / 8L / 0D | 85.1 |
| 2022 | 46W / 23L / 9D | 38W / 38L / 4D | 99.6 |
| 2021 | 49W / 13L / 8D | 41W / 27L / 4D | 97.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 42 | 28 | 10 | 4 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 37 | 19 | 15 | 3 | 51.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 26 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 76.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 19 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 47.4% |
| Petrov's Defense | 17 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 41.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 46.1% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 27.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Four Knights Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 8 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 4 |