Grandmaster Namig Guliyev
Meet Namig Guliyev, also known in the online chess kingdom as titan013, a formidable Grandmaster who has danced through thousands of chess battles with a flair only true masters possess. With a peak blitz rating approaching the 3000 mark (2996 to be exact in August 2019), Namig is no stranger to the pressure cooker of fast-paced games, where speed and precision decide fate.
Namig’s journey through chess has been a whirlwind of intensity: from lightning-fast bullet duels where the fingers fly almost as quickly as the queen across the board, boasting a peak bullet rating of 2827, to the more ponderous rapid games with a peak rating over 2500. Despite the rapid clicking and mouse dances, this GM’s games reveal a deep strategic mindset underlying fierce tactical awareness, demonstrated by an impressive 85% comeback rate after setbacks.
One could say Namig plays chess like a grandmaster and a magician combined — conjuring attacks from the shadows and rescuing positions when the odds seem grim. With over 42,000 recorded wins across formats, the statistics proudly reflect a player who not only perseveres but dominates.
Off the battlefield of 64 squares, Namig’s style is fascinatingly stubborn: with an early resignation rate under 1% and games often stretching over 70 moves, patience is clearly a virtue. When the clock ticks to the wee hours (1 AM is prime time), the pieces start moving with inspired brilliance — befitting a player with a tilt factor of just 15, meaning frustrations rarely cause collapse.
Noteworthy is Namig's favorite secret weapon — an intriguingly named "Top Secret" opening, which has netted a fantastic 62% win rate in blitz and nearly 57% in bullet! Meanwhile, unknown openings keep opponents guessing but still yield more than half wins, proving Namig’s adaptability and opening repertoire depth.
Recent Triumph
In February 2025, Namig secured a sharp victory in a Sicilian Defense encounter, closing the game by resignation against GM Levan Pantsulaia. The game was a masterclass on exploiting pressure and converting an advantage with ruthless precision — check out the final moves on Chess.com.
A Fun Fact
It’s rumored that Namig’s keyboard occasionally overheats due to the sheer intensity of bullet games played. Some say this is the sound of chess genius in action — or possibly just excessive caffeine consumption synchronized with mouse clicks!
Whether tearing apart defenses in milliseconds or grinding out wins in marathon endgames, Grandmaster Namig Guliyev embodies the spirit of chess mastery with a dash of fun and a mountain of skill.
Hi Namig Guliyev!
This report is based on your last batch of rapid games. Use it as a roadmap rather than a verdict—progress in chess is rarely linear.
At-a-glance
Peak ratings: 2572 (2023-02-03), 2996 (2019-08-02)
Activity curves:
What you already do well
- Dynamic piece play. Your win against GM_Levan_Pantsulaia shows confident use of the initiative (initiative) and accurate calculation in messy Sicilian positions.
- Resourcefulness in complications. In several victories you converted material imbalances smoothly (e.g. the Queen-vs-pieces endgame on 02-12).
- Opening variety. You alternate 1.e4, 1.c4 and even 1.Nf3, which keeps opponents guessing and broadens your understanding of pawn structures.
Recurring problems
- Early king exposure & over-extension.
• Loss vs DarkAlekhine (Alekhine’s Defence) shows queenside pawn grabs (15.Qb5) left your king unsafe.
• The Philidor loss featured an ambitious 5.g4 without completing development.
Fix: Before pawn lunges ask “How many pieces defend my king?” - Time management.
Four of the last six losses were on time in roughly equal or better positions.
Fix: Adopt a move-pair rhythm (e.g. “spend max 20 sec every 3 moves until move 20”) and add 1-min end-of-game buffer. - Handling symmetrical centre positions.
In the Petroff vs DanielNaroditsky you drifted into a passive structure after 11…Nc6 12.Nc3 d4.
Fix: Review model games where Black solves the Petroff centre via …c5/…c6 breaks. - Converting technical endgames.
The K+R+P vs K+R ending against GeorgMeier slipped in time trouble.
Fix: Daily 10-minute drill on Rook endings (Philidor, Lucena). Use “Stop-the-clock” mode so speed becomes automatic.
Critical moment example
After 15.Qb5 Nd4?! in the Alekhine game:
Black’s pieces flooded in while your queen chased pawns. Calculating two moves deeper would reveal that 15…Nxe5! equalises safely.
Four-week action plan
- Week 1 & 2: 30 min/day on Alekhine & Petroff model games; build a one-page “trigger list” of typical pawn breaks.
- Week 3: 20 min tactics (theme: zwischenzug zwischenzug) + 20 min endgames + sparring 15|10 vs engine set to 2300.
- Week 4: Time-control drills: play 5 rapid games focusing solely on clock discipline. Annotate them, marking every move where you spent >45 sec.
Mindset cues for every game
- “Can I improve the worst-placed minor piece before pushing a pawn?”
- “If the queens come off now, whose endgame favours me?”
- “Is this decision worth more than 30 seconds?” (If not, move.)
Keep the curiosity high and the moves purposeful—rating gains will follow. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Leo Bispo | 123W / 74L / 9D | |
| white31 | 94W / 62L / 5D | |
| Christian Stevens | 69W / 67L / 10D | |
| Anselm Wagner | 62W / 51L / 7D | |
| WarlordX | 56W / 54L / 7D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2876 | 2766 | 2478 | |
| 2024 | 2664 | 2500 | ||
| 2023 | 2613 | 2766 | 2500 | |
| 2022 | 2769 | 2803 | ||
| 2021 | 2755 | 2715 | ||
| 2020 | 2692 | 2715 | 2179 | |
| 2019 | 2570 | 2775 | ||
| 2018 | 2505 | 2701 | 1942 | |
| 2017 | 2324 | 2585 | 1933 | |
| 2016 | 1050 | 2100 | 1046 | 1815 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 220W / 114L / 17D | 210W / 107L / 21D | 83.4 |
| 2024 | 6W / 4L / 4D | 5W / 10L / 1D | 99.9 |
| 2023 | 13W / 15L / 4D | 16W / 13L / 3D | 95.3 |
| 2022 | 157W / 65L / 13D | 146W / 73L / 18D | 83.7 |
| 2021 | 80W / 53L / 16D | 79W / 52L / 17D | 85.6 |
| 2020 | 649W / 407L / 55D | 582W / 456L / 74D | 82.8 |
| 2019 | 1786W / 1119L / 165D | 1623W / 1271L / 167D | 80.3 |
| 2018 | 2375W / 1588L / 214D | 2176W / 1759L / 226D | 81.4 |
| 2017 | 496W / 283L / 61D | 510W / 286L / 46D | 84.6 |
| 2016 | 62W / 32L / 1D | 70W / 29L / 2D | 59.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 241 | 127 | 100 | 14 | 52.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 230 | 137 | 81 | 12 | 59.6% |
| QGA: 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 | 170 | 93 | 64 | 13 | 54.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 130 | 76 | 45 | 9 | 58.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 123 | 66 | 46 | 11 | 53.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 123 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 52.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 119 | 70 | 37 | 12 | 58.8% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 99 | 63 | 26 | 10 | 63.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 95 | 46 | 39 | 10 | 48.4% |
| Semi-Slav Defense Accepted | 94 | 57 | 29 | 8 | 60.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 828 | 457 | 330 | 41 | 55.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 513 | 277 | 204 | 32 | 54.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 512 | 282 | 207 | 23 | 55.1% |
| Modern | 424 | 239 | 167 | 18 | 56.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 404 | 249 | 143 | 12 | 61.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 392 | 182 | 188 | 22 | 46.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 376 | 210 | 145 | 21 | 55.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 363 | 165 | 179 | 19 | 45.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 360 | 208 | 142 | 10 | 57.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 329 | 176 | 136 | 17 | 53.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| QGA: Classical, 6...a6 7.a3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed, Bogoljubow Variation | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGA: 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 66 | 23 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |